Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

compulsory joinder

Read a random definition: crime score

A quick definition of compulsory joinder:

Compulsory joinder is when you have to include all the people or claims that are necessary for a lawsuit to be fair. If you don't include them, the case might be dismissed. In civil cases, there are rules that say who must be included. In criminal cases, all the charges against a person that come from the same event must be included in one trial. This helps make sure that people are treated fairly and that the legal system is efficient.

A more thorough explanation:

Compulsory joinder, also known as mandatory joinder, is the process of joining parties or claims to a single lawsuit. It is required for the lawsuit to proceed. Failure to join a compulsory party may result in dismissal of the lawsuit.

In civil procedure, Rule 19 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure governs the compulsory joinder of parties. This rule is intended to protect a party's right to be heard and to participate in the adjudication of a claimed interest. Rule 19 states that a person who is subject to service of process and whose joinder will not deprive the court of subject-matter jurisdiction must be joined as a party if:

  • In that person's absence, the court cannot accord complete relief among existing parties; or
  • That person claims an interest relating to the subject of the action, and is so situated that disposing of the action in the person's absence may:
    • As a practical matter, impair or impede the person's ability to protect the interest; or
    • Leave an existing party subject to a substantial risk of incurring double, multiple, or otherwise inconsistent obligations because of the interest.

For example, if a person owns a piece of property that is being disputed in a lawsuit, that person must be joined as a party to the lawsuit. If they are not joined, the court cannot accord complete relief among the existing parties, and the lawsuit may be dismissed.

In criminal procedure, the compulsory joinder rule requires a prosecutor to bring all known charges against a defendant arising from a single criminal episode in a single action. This rule is meant to protect defendants from government harassment and being subjected to successive trials for offenses stemming from the same criminal episode. Additionally, the rule promotes judicial economy by avoiding repetitive litigation.

For example, if a defendant is charged with assault and battery for an incident that occurred on a specific date, the prosecutor must bring all charges related to that incident in a single trial. They cannot bring separate trials for each charge.

Compulsory joinder is an important aspect of both civil and criminal procedures. It ensures that all parties with an interest in a lawsuit are joined to the action, and that the lawsuit can proceed without the risk of inconsistent obligations or repetitive litigation.

compulsory counterclaim | compulsory license

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.