Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

compulsory joinder

Read a random definition: pro re nata

A quick definition of compulsory joinder:

Compulsory joinder is when you have to include all the people or claims that are necessary for a lawsuit to be fair. If you don't include them, the case might be dismissed. In civil cases, there are rules that say who must be included. In criminal cases, all the charges against a person that come from the same event must be included in one trial. This helps make sure that people are treated fairly and that the legal system is efficient.

A more thorough explanation:

Compulsory joinder, also known as mandatory joinder, is the process of joining parties or claims to a single lawsuit. It is required for the lawsuit to proceed. Failure to join a compulsory party may result in dismissal of the lawsuit.

In civil procedure, Rule 19 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure governs the compulsory joinder of parties. This rule is intended to protect a party's right to be heard and to participate in the adjudication of a claimed interest. Rule 19 states that a person who is subject to service of process and whose joinder will not deprive the court of subject-matter jurisdiction must be joined as a party if:

  • In that person's absence, the court cannot accord complete relief among existing parties; or
  • That person claims an interest relating to the subject of the action, and is so situated that disposing of the action in the person's absence may:
    • As a practical matter, impair or impede the person's ability to protect the interest; or
    • Leave an existing party subject to a substantial risk of incurring double, multiple, or otherwise inconsistent obligations because of the interest.

For example, if a person owns a piece of property that is being disputed in a lawsuit, that person must be joined as a party to the lawsuit. If they are not joined, the court cannot accord complete relief among the existing parties, and the lawsuit may be dismissed.

In criminal procedure, the compulsory joinder rule requires a prosecutor to bring all known charges against a defendant arising from a single criminal episode in a single action. This rule is meant to protect defendants from government harassment and being subjected to successive trials for offenses stemming from the same criminal episode. Additionally, the rule promotes judicial economy by avoiding repetitive litigation.

For example, if a defendant is charged with assault and battery for an incident that occurred on a specific date, the prosecutor must bring all charges related to that incident in a single trial. They cannot bring separate trials for each charge.

Compulsory joinder is an important aspect of both civil and criminal procedures. It ensures that all parties with an interest in a lawsuit are joined to the action, and that the lawsuit can proceed without the risk of inconsistent obligations or repetitive litigation.

compulsory counterclaim | compulsory license

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
MIAMI A
[] AromaticTroubledDormouse
20:55
How does one know if they are UR1 or UR2?
[] AromaticTroubledDormouse
20:56
CONGRATS MACAQUE!
TY
got a random stanford email and almost had a heart attack
ALSO CONGRATS!
Congrats1!
21:15
Miami A, yall I'm so excited I could cry.
21:15
Feel like I can finally stop holding my breath!! Whew!!!
[] baddestbunny
22:16
every time I get accosted by a strange man who follows me around because my male coworkers were too busy talking to walk me back to my car I get closer to saying we need to bring back traditional gender roles
Dkk
22:32
Nice! @Macaque
Dkk
22:32
@Aromatic, Have to guess.
Dkk
22:33
That sucks @Bunny do you have to go to the hospital?
[] baddestbunny
22:40
I said accosted not assaulted
23:35
guys. my notre dame address just went long is this good or bad
1a2b3c4d26z
23:37
Oooooo me too
23:37
omg is this good or bad
Dkk
23:47
Idk if gender roles are gunna fix that then.
23:49
it looks like most people who applied in october last cycle didn't get a decision until january... does it even mean anything that our addresses went long??
hows ED 2 compared to ED 1?
Dkk
0:10
No idea
windyMagician
0:34
reporting live to say my ndls address also went long
does it mean anything ^
Dkk
2:21
NDLS and Fordham took a very long time last year. It's good info for people to know.
[] baddestbunny
4:29
let’s get after it boys and girls
Dkk
5:21
I gtg to bed soon.
Dkk
5:22
Big day today. Gunna be a crazy one. I will sleep through the first half.
good morning lsd it is 5 am EST
also jazzy my ndls address went long ages ago i sadly do not think it means anything
my stanford address also went long LOL i think at most it's an indicator it's under review
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.