Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

compulsory joinder

Read a random definition: accused

A quick definition of compulsory joinder:

Compulsory joinder is when you have to include all the people or claims that are necessary for a lawsuit to be fair. If you don't include them, the case might be dismissed. In civil cases, there are rules that say who must be included. In criminal cases, all the charges against a person that come from the same event must be included in one trial. This helps make sure that people are treated fairly and that the legal system is efficient.

A more thorough explanation:

Compulsory joinder, also known as mandatory joinder, is the process of joining parties or claims to a single lawsuit. It is required for the lawsuit to proceed. Failure to join a compulsory party may result in dismissal of the lawsuit.

In civil procedure, Rule 19 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure governs the compulsory joinder of parties. This rule is intended to protect a party's right to be heard and to participate in the adjudication of a claimed interest. Rule 19 states that a person who is subject to service of process and whose joinder will not deprive the court of subject-matter jurisdiction must be joined as a party if:

  • In that person's absence, the court cannot accord complete relief among existing parties; or
  • That person claims an interest relating to the subject of the action, and is so situated that disposing of the action in the person's absence may:
    • As a practical matter, impair or impede the person's ability to protect the interest; or
    • Leave an existing party subject to a substantial risk of incurring double, multiple, or otherwise inconsistent obligations because of the interest.

For example, if a person owns a piece of property that is being disputed in a lawsuit, that person must be joined as a party to the lawsuit. If they are not joined, the court cannot accord complete relief among the existing parties, and the lawsuit may be dismissed.

In criminal procedure, the compulsory joinder rule requires a prosecutor to bring all known charges against a defendant arising from a single criminal episode in a single action. This rule is meant to protect defendants from government harassment and being subjected to successive trials for offenses stemming from the same criminal episode. Additionally, the rule promotes judicial economy by avoiding repetitive litigation.

For example, if a defendant is charged with assault and battery for an incident that occurred on a specific date, the prosecutor must bring all charges related to that incident in a single trial. They cannot bring separate trials for each charge.

Compulsory joinder is an important aspect of both civil and criminal procedures. It ensures that all parties with an interest in a lawsuit are joined to the action, and that the lawsuit can proceed without the risk of inconsistent obligations or repetitive litigation.

compulsory counterclaim | compulsory license

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
11:11
nothing you dont already know
Dkk
11:12
Lmfao, damn out of messages again. Time to go sit in the hot tub.
11:12
@BulbasaurNoLikeCardio: honestly fuck these schools
11:12
The way they act is so cringe and gives mad ick
babycat
11:12
@BulbasaurNoLikeCardio: people are saying this has been a pattern with them
babycat
11:12
imagine being a religious school and not supporting mothers. practice what you preach!
11:12
Fuck dem hoes
11:13
Child bearing people*
11:13
i cant spell fuck dont correct me
11:15
Anywayyyyy, i think today i will withdraw all my apps
11:15
This lsat is not doing it
babycat
11:15
lol live ur truth
11:15
ASU at 154 is damn good
11:15
154 scholly
BulbasaurNoLikeCardio
11:15
It is shitty that was a pattern of behavior but I am glad someone is finally standing up for themselves. Like I can be a pretty rigid butthole guy when it comes to getting stuff but a complete lack of empathy or situational awareness shown by the school and their staff is mind blowing. When I was talking about it in the office they all thought I was lying cause it sounds so crazy.
Dkk
11:16
@babycat: ahh link me something. Idk what you are talking about with GTown and mothers and all that.
11:16
Idk if any of you watch UFC but one time interim heavyweight champ Tom Aspinall won a fight and said on the mic afterwards “if you feel scared to do something, that’s a pretty good sign you should just go fucking do it” and I believe that applies very much to people wondering if they should R&R. Sure you can but why not just see what happens now?
babycat
11:16
School fucked up so bad they got hellwoods to sign a petition
11:16
Ive also heard their career center is awful too, I think its why it will never be anything but 14-15
JumpySubsequentDolphin
11:17
@Dkk: i think a law student was pregnant and due to give birth a few days before finals and they refused to accomodate her
JumpySubsequentDolphin
11:17
accommodate*
11:17
@Mostlylegal: yeah and i was thinking fuck it just go party for three years but i got other options and need to start building, top law schools were worth that 3 year pause but i am not sure i can do that for asu and their outcomes
11:19
Also I just got diagnosed with ADHD is it stupid if I dont take the test again now that Im medicated?
Dkk
11:19
She offered to take it early? Should have given her that one. Remote I can understand saying no to but taking it early, yes.
babycat
11:20
big things coming for babycat. I own a resistance band now
concorde
11:20
@renard99: jones needs to take this advice and fight aspinall
11:21
is that what they are calling punk rock bands these days?
BulbasaurNoLikeCardio
11:21
@babycat: did you get a booboo or just trying to do more workouts at home?
11:21
@Mostlylegal: I jumped six points after beginning adhd meds. Might be worth it
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.