Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Computer Software Protection Act of 1984

Read a random definition: per aes et libram

A quick definition of Computer Software Protection Act of 1984:

The Computer Software Protection Act of 1984 is a law that was created to protect computer programs from being copied illegally. It is an amendment to the Copyright Act of 1976. This law helps to ensure that the people who create computer programs are able to control how their work is used and distributed.

A more thorough explanation:

The Computer Software Protection Act of 1984 is a law that was added to the Copyright Act of 1976. Its purpose is to protect computer programs that are copyrighted from being illegally copied.

For example, if a company creates a computer program and copyrights it, the Computer Software Protection Act of 1984 would prevent someone from making copies of that program without permission. This law helps to ensure that the creators of computer programs are able to protect their work and make a profit from it.

Another example would be if a person buys a computer program, they are not allowed to make copies of it and distribute it to others. This would be considered illegal under the Computer Software Protection Act of 1984.

Overall, the Computer Software Protection Act of 1984 is an important law that helps to protect the rights of those who create computer programs. It ensures that their work is not stolen or copied without permission, which helps to encourage innovation and creativity in the field of computer programming.

Computer Software Protection Act of 1980 | Computer Software Rental Amendments Act

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.