Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

conjunctio animorum

Read a random definition: mandatory commitment

A quick definition of conjunctio animorum:

Term: CONJUNCTIO ANIMORUM

Definition: Conjunctio animorum is a Latin term used in Scots law to describe the mutual agreement between two people to get married. It means that both parties have given their consent to enter into a marriage.

A more thorough explanation:

Conjunctio animorum is a Latin term used in Scots law to refer to the mutual consent of parties to a marriage.

When a couple decides to get married, they must both give their conjunctio animorum or mutual consent to the marriage. This means that they both agree to enter into the marriage willingly and without any coercion or pressure from anyone else.

For example, if John proposes to Jane and she says yes, they have both given their conjunctio animorum to the marriage. They have both agreed to enter into the marriage willingly and without any outside pressure.

Another example would be if two people decide to get married without a formal proposal. If they both discuss and agree to get married, they have given their conjunctio animorum to the marriage.

These examples illustrate how conjunctio animorum is the mutual consent of both parties to a marriage. It is an important concept in Scots law because it ensures that both parties are entering into the marriage willingly and without any outside pressure.

conjunctim et divisim | conjunctive denial

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
20:32
I mean I think even the student body there only like 15 percent is part of fedsoc
It's more just not a good # for people who aren't willing to clerk conservative. I'm sure they place liberal clerks at an above average rate for a t-6 though. Maybe higher (not entirely sure)
texaslawhopefully
20:34
Page 14 has ideological splits by school: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/msen/files/law-prof-ideology.pdf
texaslawhopefully
20:35
Chicago/UVA are more to the right but not by an exceedingly large difference
lilypadfrog
20:36
I feel like UVA doesn’t have that reputation the way Chicago does. That’s interesting. Thanks tex
yeah I've heard about uva being conservative
siroracle
20:48
Yeah it’s only 75 percent lib that’s pretty terrifying
Dkk
20:53
lmfao
20:59
@siroracle: funny cause true
@siroracle: don't you have a bridge to be under?
shouldn't you be collecting tolls
21:00
trolololol
atwatodbit
21:04
anyone know much about mich clerking
atwatodbit
21:05
ive tried to learn more about it but its hard to cut through stuff. numbers wise they look good?
21:06
this website is a good research tool for outcomes: https://app.lawhub.org/schools
atwatodbit
21:06
@llama: thanks!
21:06
yah
Dkk
21:10
Anyone else read the Antioch shooters manifesto today. Pretty crazy stuff.
21:14
sad
YRDSL
21:31
@texaslawhopefully: it's pretty funny how even in law journal articles people can't stop confusing Penn with Penn State
texaslawhopefully
21:40
lmfao I didn't even notice that
21:42
Yeah to penn Carey students I’m sure that is a
21:42
Those are fighting words
21:46
@Dkk: one of the most deranged documents i've ever had the displeasure of reading
lilypadfrog
22:03
sometimes I go into fight or flight mode until I get all my work done
i call that locking in
Dkk
22:29
@info-man: Indeed!
22:43
No movement today
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.