Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

consequential damages

Read a random definition: American Indian law

A quick definition of consequential damages:

Consequential damages, also known as special damages, are a type of compensation that a person can ask for when someone else's actions cause harm that leads to additional losses or expenses. These damages may not be a direct result of the initial wrongdoing, but they are a natural consequence of it. For example, if a car accident caused a person to miss work and lose income, the lost wages would be considered consequential damages. Consequential damages are different from general damages, which are compensation for more direct harm like physical injuries or emotional distress.

A more thorough explanation:

Consequential damages

Consequential damages, also known as special damages, are a type of compensation that a plaintiff can seek from a defendant for harm caused as a result of the defendant's actions. These damages may not necessarily be a direct result of the defendant's wrongful action, but rather a natural consequence of the act.

  • A construction company fails to complete a project on time, causing the owner of the building to lose out on potential rental income. The owner can seek consequential damages for the lost income.
  • A car manufacturer produces a faulty vehicle that causes an accident, resulting in the driver's medical bills and lost wages. The driver can seek consequential damages for the financial losses incurred as a result of the accident.

These examples illustrate how consequential damages are a form of compensation for losses that are a direct result of the defendant's actions, but not necessarily a direct result of the wrongful act itself.

consent order | conservatee

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.