Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

constructive amendment of indictment

Read a random definition: MBO

A quick definition of constructive amendment of indictment:

Constructive Amendment of Indictment: This refers to a change made to the original charges in an indictment that alters the substance of the offense charged. It is a type of amendment of indictment that is not allowed because it violates the defendant's constitutional right to be informed of the charges against them. In simpler terms, it means that the prosecution cannot change the charges against a defendant without proper notice and opportunity to defend themselves.

A more thorough explanation:

Constructive amendment of indictment refers to a change made to the charges against a defendant that is not done through the proper legal process. This can happen when the prosecution alters the charges in a way that is not authorized by law or the grand jury indictment.

For example, if a defendant is indicted for robbery, but during the trial, the prosecution changes the charge to burglary, this would be considered a constructive amendment of the indictment. This is because the defendant did not have proper notice of the charges against them and was not given the opportunity to prepare a defense for the new charge.

Another example of constructive amendment of indictment could be if the prosecution changes the time frame or location of the alleged crime without going through the proper legal process. This can also be considered a violation of the defendant's rights and can lead to a mistrial or dismissal of the charges.

Overall, constructive amendment of indictment is a serious issue in criminal trials as it can lead to a violation of the defendant's rights and a miscarriage of justice.

constructive adverse possession | constructive assent

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.