Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

grand jury

Read a random definition: family-expense statute

A quick definition of grand jury:

A grand jury is a group of people who decide if there is enough evidence to charge someone with a crime. They meet in private and listen to the evidence presented by the prosecutor. The grand jury can ask for more evidence if they need it. They act independently and are not influenced by anyone else. Their job is to make sure the government is not abusing its power.

A more thorough explanation:

A grand jury is a group of people who decide whether there is enough evidence to charge someone with a crime. This group is made up of 16 to 23 people who are selected to serve for a period of one month up to one year. The grand jury proceedings are held in private, and the person who is suspected of committing the crime is usually not present.

The grand jury acts as an investigative body, and they work independently of the prosecuting attorney or judge. The prosecutors present the case to the grand jury and try to establish probable cause to believe that a criminal offense has been committed. The grand jury may request that the court compel further evidence, including witness testimony and subpoenas of documents. They are generally free to pursue their investigations without external influence or supervision.

The grand jury is an important part of the criminal justice system in the United States. They act as a buffer between the government and the people, providing a check on governmental power.

For example, if someone is suspected of committing a crime, the prosecutor may present the case to a grand jury. The grand jury will review the evidence and decide whether there is enough evidence to charge the person with a crime. If they decide that there is enough evidence, they will issue an indictment, which formally charges the person with committing a crime and begins the criminal prosecution process.

Graham v. Richardson | grand jury witness

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.