Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

consul

Read a random definition: sexual assault

A quick definition of consul:

A consul is a person who represents their home country in a foreign country to help with commercial and other matters involving their home country's citizens in that foreign country. They are not diplomats, but they have special protections that keep them safe while they do their job. Consuls help their country's citizens with things like legal documents, property, and even registering births, deaths, and marriages. Sometimes, there is a consul general who is in charge of other consuls in different regions. In ancient Rome, a consul was a leader who had a lot of power, but that is not what a consul means today.

A more thorough explanation:

A consul is a representative of a government who lives in a foreign country to oversee commercial and other matters involving the representative's home country and its citizens in that foreign country. Consuls are not diplomatic agents, so they do not enjoy diplomatic privileges and immunities. However, they are entitled to consular immunities, which protect them from local law and jurisdiction in the exercise of their consular functions.

  • A US consul in China helps American citizens who are living or traveling in China. They can provide assistance with passports, visas, and other legal matters.
  • A French consul in Brazil promotes trade between France and Brazil. They help French companies do business in Brazil and assist French citizens who are living or traveling in Brazil.

These examples illustrate how consuls work to protect the interests of their home country and its citizens in a foreign country. They provide assistance with legal matters, promote trade, and help citizens who are living or traveling abroad.

consuetudo mercatorum | consular invoice

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.