Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

content-based restriction

Read a random definition: criminology

A quick definition of content-based restriction:

A content-based restriction is a rule that limits what someone can say or write based on the specific words or ideas they use. This type of restriction is usually not allowed under the law, but it may be allowed if the government has a very good reason for it and the rule is very specific and narrow. For example, the government might be allowed to restrict speech that is likely to cause violence or harm to others.

A more thorough explanation:

A content-based restriction is a type of restraint on speech that targets the substance or message of the speech itself. This type of restriction is generally considered unconstitutional, but it may be allowed if it serves a compelling state interest and is narrowly tailored to achieve that interest.

For example, a law that prohibits all speech critical of the government would be a content-based restriction and would likely be unconstitutional. However, a law that prohibits speech that incites violence or poses a clear and present danger to public safety may be allowed as it serves a compelling state interest.

Another example of a content-based restriction is a law that prohibits certain types of speech based on their subject matter, such as a law that prohibits all speech related to a particular religion. This type of restriction would also be considered unconstitutional unless it serves a compelling state interest and is narrowly tailored to achieve that interest.

content-based discrimination | contentious possession

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.