Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

contestation of suit

Read a random definition: RL/C

A quick definition of contestation of suit:

Contestation of Suit: In ecclesiastical law, contestation of suit refers to the moment in a legal case when the defendant responds to the plaintiff's complaint. This is also known as the plea and joinder of an issue. It is the point in the case where both parties have presented their arguments and the case can proceed to trial.

A more thorough explanation:

Contestation of suit is a legal term used in ecclesiastical law. It refers to the point in a legal action when the defendant responds to the plaintiff's complaint. This response is called a plea and joinder of an issue. It is also known as litis contestatio.

For example, if a person sues another person for breach of contract, the defendant will respond to the plaintiff's complaint by filing a written answer. This answer will include any defenses the defendant may have, such as the plaintiff's failure to perform their obligations under the contract. Once the defendant files their answer, the case is said to be in contestation of suit.

Another example could be in a divorce case. If one spouse files for divorce, the other spouse will respond to the complaint by filing an answer. This answer may include any defenses the spouse may have, such as the lack of grounds for divorce. Once the answer is filed, the case is said to be in contestation of suit.

These examples illustrate how contestation of suit is the point in a legal action when the defendant responds to the plaintiff's complaint, and the case becomes contested. It is an important step in the legal process, as it sets the stage for the rest of the case.

contestatio litis | contested divorce

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.