Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

continuando

Read a random definition: mala demonstratio

A quick definition of continuando:

Term: continuando

Definition: Continuando means that someone has done something wrong to someone else's property and it keeps happening. For example, if someone's cows keep eating another person's grass, the person who owns the grass can say that the cows are doing it "by continuing" and they don't have to sue the cow owner every time it happens. This is called "laying the action with a continuando." It's an old legal term that means the same thing as "by continuing."

A more thorough explanation:

Term: Continuando
Definition: Continuando is a legal term that means "by continuing". It is used to describe a situation where a wrongful act or trespass against someone's property is ongoing or continuous. For example, if someone's cattle keep spoiling or consuming another person's herbage, the injured party can use the term continuando to allege that the injury is ongoing and has been committed from one day to another. This means that the plaintiff does not have to bring separate legal actions for each day's separate offense. The term is often used in legal cases involving property disputes.
Example: John owns a farm and has a herd of cows. His cows keep wandering into Mary's farm and spoiling her crops. Mary can use the term continuando to allege that John's cows have been continuously trespassing on her property and causing damage. This means that Mary can bring one legal action against John instead of multiple actions for each day's separate offense.

continual injury | continuation

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.