Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Vega v. Tekoh (2022)

Read a random definition: standing to sue

A quick definition of Vega v. Tekoh (2022):

Vega v. Tekoh (2022) is a court case where the Supreme Court decided that if a police officer doesn't tell someone their Miranda rights before questioning them, it doesn't necessarily mean that their rights were violated. Miranda rights are the rights that someone has when they are being questioned by the police, like the right to remain silent and the right to a lawyer. The Court said that even if the police officer didn't follow the rules, it doesn't always mean that the person's rights were taken away. This decision means that people can't sue police officers just because they didn't follow the Miranda rules.

A more thorough explanation:

Vega v. Tekoh (2022) is a Supreme Court case that ruled that a violation of Miranda Rights does not necessarily provide a basis for relief under 42 U.S. Code § 1983.

The case involved the interrogation of Terence Tekoh by Deputy Carlos Vega. Vega questioned Tekoh at his workplace but did not inform him of his Miranda rights. Tekoh provided a written statement that admitted guilt, which was later used in trial. After a jury found Tekoh not guilty, he sued Vega under 42 U.S.C § 1983 (Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights).

The Supreme Court decided that a violation of Miranda does not necessarily constitute a violation of the Fifth Amendment right against compelled self-incrimination. The Court stated that Miranda imposed "a set of prophylactic rules" but did not hold that a violation of those rules necessarily constituted a Fifth Amendment violation. The Court further determined that post-Miranda decisions had balanced interests that justified restrictions that would not have been possible if a Miranda violation was a Fifth Amendment violation. Additionally, the Court establishes that "a judicially crafted prophylactic rule" should only apply "where its benefits outweigh its costs."

This decision has implications for the use of Miranda warnings and qualified immunity. It means that a violation of Miranda does not necessarily provide a basis for relief under 42 U.S. Code § 1983.

If a police officer fails to read a suspect their Miranda rights before questioning them, the suspect's confession may still be admissible in court if the court determines that the failure to read the Miranda rights did not violate the suspect's Fifth Amendment rights.

Vartelas v. Holder | Vehicular homicide

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah i thought you were tweaking for a second
i'm so sorry everyone what the actual fuck this website hates me
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:35
Jack's just tweaking on LSD no biggie
to be fair this accurately represents my mental state
election day psychosis coming in hot (fordham)
usc pls pull through .....
i literally just need one A so i can relax before my ED decision
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:38
oh that's right USC might release
soapy
9:43
USC still has not looked at my app
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:43
when did you submit soapy?
soapy
9:44
10/16
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:44
to be fair it took them almost 2 months for me to go under review
soapy
9:44
Feelin a bit stressed, as I've got no date change for Michigan either despite applying 10/7
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:45
I have not had a date change either for Mich but I've seen people get in without one so who knows
I applied 9/25 to like 6 schools and some (Houston) have no date change yet so dw
soapy
9:46
But do people get in without addresses going long?
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:46
it's tough to tell because a lot of people type out their addresses long to begin with
soapy
9:46
Ah. I didn't. Looking back, my Mich supplement kind of sucks, so there's that
Mich overrated (Dean Z please let me in even tho i didnt apply and I am below both 25ths)
ClassyPleasantHeron
10:01
The "date changes" at Michigan really don't mean anything. We had to do them in undergrad admissions whenever a Georgia applicant picked the country instead of the state, because we'd have to remove the TOEFL requirement and reassign the application from the international application readers.
soapy
10:06
Classy, does that mean they may look at your application, and that look doesn't necessarily trigger any date change?
1a2b3c4d26z
10:06
Man
1a2b3c4d26z
10:07
Walkin to the bus
1a2b3c4d26z
10:07
What a good day to get into law school
ClassyPleasantHeron
10:11
@soapy: I don't know for sure about the law school. For undergrad, once the application is complete, it's assigned to a reader the following Monday. If we had to make any changes, it's because a reader saw something that needed to be changed and the application needed to be re-read after that change.
soapy
10:12
Ahh, got it. Thank you for the insight!
ClassyPleasantHeron
10:14
You're welcome. FWIW, I have no idea what's up with the address changes. We didn't have to do any of that, except for the Georgia state vs country kinds of things.
soapy
10:15
I've heard it theorized that some schools will change the address from "St." --> "Street" as they prepare to send out admissions packets. That's the rumor, anyways.
i think it just indicates a change in status like under review or stages of review
my stanford address went long as soon as it was marked complete lmao
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.