Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

contract to satisfaction

Read a random definition: acquisition cost

A quick definition of contract to satisfaction:

A contract is an agreement between two or more people that creates responsibilities that can be enforced by law. It can be a written document or just a verbal agreement. A contract can also be called a promise or a set of promises that the law recognizes as a duty. Sometimes people use the word "contract" to refer to the written document, but it's important to remember that the rules of law usually refer to the agreement itself, not just the writing.

A more thorough explanation:

A contract to satisfaction is a type of contract where one party agrees to perform a service or provide goods to another party, and the satisfaction of the second party is a condition for the completion of the contract. This means that the second party has the right to reject the service or goods if they are not satisfied with them.

For example, if a homeowner hires a contractor to paint their house, they may include a contract to satisfaction clause in the agreement. This means that the homeowner has the right to inspect the work and reject it if they are not satisfied with the quality of the paint job.

Another example is a wedding photographer who agrees to take photos of a couple's wedding. The contract may include a clause that the couple has the right to reject any photos they are not satisfied with.

These examples illustrate how a contract to satisfaction gives the second party the power to ensure that they receive the service or goods they expect. It also puts pressure on the first party to perform their best work to ensure that the contract is completed to the satisfaction of the second party.

contract to pledge | contract to sell

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.