Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Convention for the Protection of Performers, Producers of Phonograms

Read a random definition: laureate

A quick definition of Convention for the Protection of Performers, Producers of Phonograms:

The Convention for the Protection of Performers, Producers of Phonograms, and Broadcasting Organizations is a treaty that sets rules to protect the rights of performers, producers, and broadcasters. It was created in 1961 and establishes the minimum standards for these rights. These rights are called neighboring rights and were not protected under previous copyright conventions. The United States did not sign this treaty. Neighboring rights are now part of the copyright protection under TRIPs.

A more thorough explanation:

The Convention for the Protection of Performers, Producers of Phonograms, and Broadcasting Organizations is a treaty that sets minimum standards for the rights of performers, producers, and broadcasters. It is also known as the Rome Convention on Related Rights.

For example, if a musician records a song, the producer of the recording and the performer of the song have rights to control how the recording is used and to receive compensation for its use. The Rome Convention sets out the minimum standards for these rights.

The United States is not a signatory to the Rome Convention, but neighboring rights are protected under the TRIPs agreement. Neighboring rights are a part of copyright protection and were not protected under the Paris Convention or the Berne Convention.

Convention for the European Patent for the Common Market | Convention for the Protection of Producers of Phonograms

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.