Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Convention Relating to the Distribution of Program-Carrying Signals

Read a random definition: sequestro habendo

A quick definition of Convention Relating to the Distribution of Program-Carrying Signals:

Convention Relating to the Distribution of Program-Carrying Signals: This is a treaty that was made in 1974 to make rules about how TV and radio signals are sent using satellites. It helps to make sure that everyone follows the same rules when they send signals through satellites. Even if the TV or radio show is not protected by any special rights, the signal itself is still protected by this treaty. The United States agreed to follow this treaty in 1984.

A more thorough explanation:

The Convention Relating to the Distribution of Program-Carrying Signals is a treaty that was established in 1974 to regulate the broadcasting and cable retransmission of signals transmitted by satellite. It is also known as the Brussels Satellite Convention.

The Convention standardizes the regulation of the signal, rather than the content being transmitted. This means that even if the content being transmitted is not protected by any intellectual-property right, the signal itself is still protected.

For example, if a satellite is transmitting a live sports event, the signal being transmitted is protected by the Convention, even if the event itself is not protected by any intellectual-property right.

The United States ratified the Brussels Satellite Convention in 1984, which means that it is legally binding in the US.

Convention on the Grant of European Patent | conventus

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
20:32
No, at least from the two people I know there that’s false. I think it’s just something like Chicago for conservatives is on par with S whereas for liberals it’s below HYS but above CCNP
texaslawhopefully
20:32
I mean I think even the student body there only like 15 percent is part of fedsoc
It's more just not a good # for people who aren't willing to clerk conservative. I'm sure they place liberal clerks at an above average rate for a t-6 though. Maybe higher (not entirely sure)
texaslawhopefully
20:34
Page 14 has ideological splits by school: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/msen/files/law-prof-ideology.pdf
texaslawhopefully
20:35
Chicago/UVA are more to the right but not by an exceedingly large difference
lilypadfrog
20:36
I feel like UVA doesn’t have that reputation the way Chicago does. That’s interesting. Thanks tex
yeah I've heard about uva being conservative
siroracle
20:48
Yeah it’s only 75 percent lib that’s pretty terrifying
Dkk
20:53
lmfao
20:59
@siroracle: funny cause true
@siroracle: don't you have a bridge to be under?
shouldn't you be collecting tolls
21:00
trolololol
atwatodbit
21:04
anyone know much about mich clerking
atwatodbit
21:05
ive tried to learn more about it but its hard to cut through stuff. numbers wise they look good?
21:06
this website is a good research tool for outcomes: https://app.lawhub.org/schools
atwatodbit
21:06
@llama: thanks!
21:06
yah
Dkk
21:10
Anyone else read the Antioch shooters manifesto today. Pretty crazy stuff.
21:14
sad
YRDSL
21:31
@texaslawhopefully: it's pretty funny how even in law journal articles people can't stop confusing Penn with Penn State
texaslawhopefully
21:40
lmfao I didn't even notice that
21:42
Yeah to penn Carey students I’m sure that is a
21:42
Those are fighting words
21:46
@Dkk: one of the most deranged documents i've ever had the displeasure of reading
lilypadfrog
22:03
sometimes I go into fight or flight mode until I get all my work done
i call that locking in
Dkk
22:29
@info-man: Indeed!
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.