Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

corroborating witness

Read a random definition: performance specification

A quick definition of corroborating witness:

A corroborating witness is someone who supports or confirms what another person has said in a court case. This is important in certain types of cases, like divorce, where a witness is needed to prove that the grounds for the divorce are true. For example, in Virginia, a corroborating witness is required in divorce cases.

A more thorough explanation:

A corroborating witness is someone who provides testimony that supports or confirms the testimony given by another person in a current case. This type of witness is particularly important in certain types of cases, such as divorce cases in some states.

In Virginia, a corroborating witness is required in divorce cases to prove to the judge that the grounds for the divorce are satisfied. For example, if one spouse claims that the other committed adultery, a corroborating witness might be someone who saw the alleged affair take place or who has other evidence to support the claim.

In Maryland and West Virginia, corroboration in the context of divorce generally requires a third-party witness to support the claim for a divorce. For example, if one spouse claims that the other was abusive, a corroborating witness might be someone who saw or heard the abuse take place, or who has other evidence to support the claim.

These examples illustrate how a corroborating witness can provide important evidence to support a claim in a legal case. Without a corroborating witness, it may be more difficult to prove that the claims being made are true.

corroborating evidence | corruption

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.