Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

corroborating evidence

Read a random definition: Edicts of Justinian

A quick definition of corroborating evidence:

Corroborating evidence is evidence that supports or confirms other evidence. It helps to make the evidence stronger and more believable. In court, it is used to help prove that someone is guilty of a crime. For example, if someone says they saw a person commit a crime, the court might need other evidence to prove that it really happened. Corroborating evidence can be things like fingerprints, DNA, or other witnesses who saw the same thing. It helps the court make a fair decision based on all the evidence.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Corroborating evidence is evidence that supports or confirms existing evidence. It is often used in court to strengthen the testimony of a witness.

For example, in California, there is a law that says a conviction cannot be based solely on the testimony of an accomplice. There must be corroborating evidence that connects the defendant to the crime. This evidence can be circumstantial, meaning it doesn't directly prove the defendant's guilt, but it does support the accomplice's testimony.

One example of corroborating evidence could be security camera footage that shows the defendant at the scene of the crime. This would support the testimony of the accomplice who said the defendant was there.

Another example could be DNA evidence that links the defendant to the crime. This would support the testimony of a witness who saw the defendant at the scene.

Overall, corroborating evidence is important because it helps to strengthen the case against a defendant and can help to prove their guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

corroborate | corroborating witness

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:06
it means you will not be rejected today and may be accepted or WL in the future
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.