Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

cost bill

Read a random definition: bill of health

A quick definition of cost bill:

Cost bill: A cost bill is a list of all the expenses that the winning party in a lawsuit has incurred during the legal process. This list is submitted to the court and the losing party after a judgment has been made. The cost bill helps determine how much the losing party will have to pay the winning party. The cost bill can include fees for the clerk, printing, witnesses, and court-appointed experts. However, attorney fees are usually not included.

A more thorough explanation:

A cost bill, also known as a bill of costs, is a detailed list of expenses incurred by the winning party in a lawsuit. This list is submitted to the court and the losing party after a judgment has been made. The cost bill is used to determine how much of the winning party's expenses the losing party will have to pay.

Examples of expenses that can be included in a cost bill are:

  • Fees for the clerk
  • Fees for serving summons and subpoenas
  • Fees for printing
  • Fees for witnesses
  • Compensation for court-appointed experts

It's important to note that there are limits to what can be included in a cost bill. For example, attorney fees are usually not allowed to be included.

Here's an example to illustrate how a cost bill works:

Let's say that John sues Jane for breach of contract and wins the case. John's lawyer prepares a cost bill that includes fees for the clerk, fees for serving summons and subpoenas, fees for printing, and fees for witnesses. The total cost bill comes to $5,000. The court then orders Jane to pay John $5,000 to cover his expenses.

cost basis | cost of completion

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.