Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

counterfeit

Read a random definition: special guardian

A quick definition of counterfeit:

A counterfeit is a fake version of something valuable, like money or designer clothes. People who make counterfeits are trying to trick others into thinking they have the real thing. It's against the law to use or make counterfeits, and people who get caught can go to jail for a long time. But if someone didn't know they were using or selling a counterfeit, they might not get in trouble.

A more thorough explanation:

A counterfeit is a fake or fraudulent copy of something valuable, such as money, documents, or designer items. People who make counterfeits often do so with the intention of tricking others into thinking they are real. For example, someone might make fake money and use it to buy things, hoping that the person they give it to won't notice it's not real.

Counterfeiting is illegal and can result in serious consequences. In the United States, federal law makes it a crime to counterfeit money or other securities with the intent to defraud. This can result in fines and up to 20 years in prison. States also have their own laws about counterfeiting, which can result in jail time and other penalties.

For example, in California, it is illegal to possess a counterfeit item. If someone is caught with a fake designer purse or watch, they could be charged with a misdemeanor or felony and face up to three years in jail. However, the government has to prove that the person knew the item was fake and intended to defraud someone else. If the person didn't know it was fake, they might be able to argue that they didn't intend to defraud anyone.

Overall, counterfeiting is a serious crime that can have serious consequences. It's important to be aware of the risks and to avoid buying or using counterfeit items.

counterclaim | counterfeiting

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.