Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

credible witness

Read a random definition: unessential mistake

A quick definition of credible witness:

A credible witness is someone who is believable and trustworthy when they give information about something they have seen or experienced. This is because they have knowledge, training, and honesty that makes their testimony more likely to be true. Judges and jurors use these factors to decide if they believe the witness. Lawyers can show that a witness is not credible by pointing out inconsistencies in their statements, a history of lying, problems with their ability to see or hear, past convictions for dishonesty, or a bias. Lawyers can also make a witness seem more credible by showing that they have always been consistent in what they say.

A more thorough explanation:

A credible witness is someone who is considered trustworthy and believable when giving testimony in a legal proceeding. This is because they have the necessary experience, knowledge, training, and honesty to provide accurate information.

  • A doctor who testifies about a patient's medical condition is considered a credible witness because of their medical training and expertise.
  • A police officer who witnessed a crime is considered a credible witness because of their training and experience in law enforcement.
  • A victim of a crime who provides testimony is considered a credible witness if they are honest and have firsthand knowledge of the events.

There are several factors that can affect a witness's credibility, including:

  • Inconsistent statements
  • A reputation for untruthfulness
  • Defects in perception
  • Prior convictions that show dishonesty or untruthfulness
  • Bias

An attorney may try to show that a witness is not credible by pointing out inconsistencies in their statements or a history of lying. On the other hand, an attorney may try to enhance a witness's credibility by showing that they have always been consistent in their statements and have a reputation for honesty.

credibility | credit

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:03
@UnderRepresentedTryhard: Yes only for YM applicants tho
RoaldDahl
16:05
dodged the mich r wave what does this mean
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:06
it means you will not be rejected today and may be accepted or WL in the future
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.