Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

credit report

Read a random definition: Justinianist

A quick definition of credit report:

A credit report is a document that shows how well a person has paid back money they have borrowed in the past. It includes information like their name, address, and job history, as well as details about loans, credit cards, and bills they have had. Banks and other lenders use credit reports to decide if someone is trustworthy enough to lend money to. People can get a free copy of their credit report once a year to make sure everything is correct.

A more thorough explanation:

A credit report is a document that provides a detailed summary of a person's credit history. It includes information about their loans, credit cards, bills, accounts, payments, bankruptcies, and credit searches. Credit reports are prepared by credit bureaus using financial information collected from creditors.

Lenders use credit reports to determine a person's creditworthiness when they apply for a loan. For example, if someone has a history of paying their bills on time and has a good credit score, they are more likely to be approved for a loan. On the other hand, if someone has a history of missed payments or defaults, they may be denied a loan or offered a higher interest rate.

Under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, consumers are entitled to a free credit report from each of the three credit bureaus (Equifax, Experian, and TransUnion) once a year. This allows people to review their credit history and make sure there are no errors or fraudulent activity.

For example, if someone notices a loan on their credit report that they did not apply for, it could be a sign of identity theft. They can then take steps to report the fraud and protect their credit.

credit insurance | credit reporting agency

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.