Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

cross-licensing

Read a random definition: assets per descent

A quick definition of cross-licensing:

Cross-licensing is when two people who own patents agree to share them with each other so they can both use the technology without getting sued. This helps inventors make money from their ideas and encourages them to keep inventing new things. Sometimes, people argue that cross-licensing is not fair, but usually, it is a good thing for everyone.

A more thorough explanation:

Cross-Licensing is an agreement between two or more patent holders to share their patents with each other. This agreement is made to avoid any legal disputes that may arise due to conflicting patents. It helps inventors to commercialize their innovations and undertake new research.

For example, if Company A has a patent for a technology that Company B needs to use in their product, and Company B has a patent that Company A needs to use in their product, they can enter into a cross-licensing agreement. This way, both companies can use each other's patented technology without any legal disputes.

Cross-license agreements have been frequently litigated in antitrust law. The court will analyze the cases that involve cross-license agreements under the Rule of Reason, in which both the anti-competitive and the pro-competitive effect of the agreement will be considered. Generally, such agreements are pro-competitive.

For instance, in the case of Feinsod v. Stiefel Labs., Inc., the court found that the cross-license agreement between the two companies was pro-competitive and did not violate antitrust laws.

In summary, cross-licensing is an agreement between patent holders to share their patents with each other to avoid legal disputes. It helps inventors to commercialize their innovations and undertake new research.

cross-examination | cruel and unusual punishment

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
MIAMI A
[] AromaticTroubledDormouse
20:55
How does one know if they are UR1 or UR2?
[] AromaticTroubledDormouse
20:56
CONGRATS MACAQUE!
TY
got a random stanford email and almost had a heart attack
ALSO CONGRATS!
Congrats1!
21:15
Miami A, yall I'm so excited I could cry.
21:15
Feel like I can finally stop holding my breath!! Whew!!!
[] baddestbunny
22:16
every time I get accosted by a strange man who follows me around because my male coworkers were too busy talking to walk me back to my car I get closer to saying we need to bring back traditional gender roles
Dkk
22:32
Nice! @Macaque
Dkk
22:32
@Aromatic, Have to guess.
Dkk
22:33
That sucks @Bunny do you have to go to the hospital?
[] baddestbunny
22:40
I said accosted not assaulted
23:35
guys. my notre dame address just went long is this good or bad
1a2b3c4d26z
23:37
Oooooo me too
23:37
omg is this good or bad
Dkk
23:47
Idk if gender roles are gunna fix that then.
23:49
it looks like most people who applied in october last cycle didn't get a decision until january... does it even mean anything that our addresses went long??
hows ED 2 compared to ED 1?
Dkk
0:10
No idea
windyMagician
0:34
reporting live to say my ndls address also went long
does it mean anything ^
Dkk
2:21
NDLS and Fordham took a very long time last year. It's good info for people to know.
[] baddestbunny
4:29
let’s get after it boys and girls
Dkk
5:21
I gtg to bed soon.
Dkk
5:22
Big day today. Gunna be a crazy one. I will sleep through the first half.
good morning lsd it is 5 am EST
also jazzy my ndls address went long ages ago i sadly do not think it means anything
my stanford address also went long LOL i think at most it's an indicator it's under review
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.