Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

cross-licensing

Read a random definition: Parliament House

A quick definition of cross-licensing:

Cross-licensing is when two people who own patents agree to share them with each other so they can both use the technology without getting sued. This helps inventors make money from their ideas and encourages them to keep inventing new things. Sometimes, people argue that cross-licensing is not fair, but usually, it is a good thing for everyone.

A more thorough explanation:

Cross-Licensing is an agreement between two or more patent holders to share their patents with each other. This agreement is made to avoid any legal disputes that may arise due to conflicting patents. It helps inventors to commercialize their innovations and undertake new research.

For example, if Company A has a patent for a technology that Company B needs to use in their product, and Company B has a patent that Company A needs to use in their product, they can enter into a cross-licensing agreement. This way, both companies can use each other's patented technology without any legal disputes.

Cross-license agreements have been frequently litigated in antitrust law. The court will analyze the cases that involve cross-license agreements under the Rule of Reason, in which both the anti-competitive and the pro-competitive effect of the agreement will be considered. Generally, such agreements are pro-competitive.

For instance, in the case of Feinsod v. Stiefel Labs., Inc., the court found that the cross-license agreement between the two companies was pro-competitive and did not violate antitrust laws.

In summary, cross-licensing is an agreement between patent holders to share their patents with each other to avoid legal disputes. It helps inventors to commercialize their innovations and undertake new research.

cross-examination | cruel and unusual punishment

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.