Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

antitrust laws

Read a random definition: small-business investment company

A quick definition of antitrust laws:

Antitrust laws are rules that prevent companies from unfairly controlling a market or limiting competition. There are three main laws: the Sherman Act Section 1, the Sherman Act Section 2, and the Clayton Act. Violations can be either a per se violation, which means it's automatically illegal, or a violation of the rule of reason, which requires further analysis. Examples of illegal practices include price fixing, bid-rigging, and monopolizing a market. Mergers between companies are also subject to review to ensure they don't harm competition.

A more thorough explanation:

Antitrust laws are federal statutes that aim to promote competition and prevent monopolies in the marketplace. The three key federal statutes in Antitrust Law are Sherman Act Section 1, Sherman Act Section 2, and the Clayton Act.

Violations under the Sherman Act take one of two forms -- either as a per se violation or as a violation of the rule of reason. Per se violations of the Sherman Act include price fixing, bid-rigging, horizontal customer allocation, and territorial allocation agreements. A per se violation requires no further inquiry into the practice's actual effect on the market or the intentions of those individuals who engaged in the practice. All other violations will be analyzed under the Rule of Reason.

For example, if two companies agree to fix prices for a certain product, this is a per se violation of the Sherman Act. However, if two companies enter into an agreement that has both pro-competitive and anti-competitive elements, the court will apply the "totality of the circumstances test" and ask whether the challenged practice promotes or suppresses market competition in net.

Horizontal agreements refer to agreements between competitors. Vertical agreements refer to agreements between manufacturers and distributors. Under Sherman Act Section 1, any agreements that unreasonably restrains competition is unlawful. All vertical agreements are analyzed under the Rule of Reason.

For example, if two competing companies agree to boycott another competitor, this is illegal per se under the Sherman Act. However, if two companies enter into a vertical agreement that requires a retailer or distributor to purchase exclusively from the manufacturer, this is subject only to the rule of reason.

The Clayton Act bars mergers when the effect “may be substantially to lessen competition or to tend to create a monopoly.” Horizontal mergers (mergers among two competitors); vertical mergers (merger among firms that have a buyer-seller relationship) and potential competition mergers (buyer is likely to enter the market and become a potential competitor of the seller) are subject to review by FTC and DOJ.

For example, if two competing companies merge and the effect is to substantially lessen competition in the marketplace, this would violate the Clayton Act.

Antitrust laws are designed to promote competition and prevent monopolies in the marketplace. Violations of these laws can result in significant penalties and legal consequences. It is important for businesses to understand and comply with these laws to avoid potential legal issues.

antitrust | antitrust violations

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
above their median for everything chat i'm ending it
I applied NYU on October 8th like r give up right?
16:46
wtf
16:47
i'd reach out to their admissions and check up on it
I did 2x and they said "The vast majority of candidates who have submitted their complete application by our deadline will be notified by the last day of April"
like kinda fucked
16:50
ugh that's so annoying
law schools that ghost should give you your money back
or reject
like man GIVE IT BACK!!!!
ClassyPleasantHeron
16:56
Schools explicitly asking applicants to retake the LSAT are TTTs pretending to be 2nd tier.
LMAOOO
like man oklahoma more like oklahowaboutyoueatmyshoe
me when that person on reddit said UofU wave and it's.... 3 people
help who just posted that right after I started bitching in chat
my heart fell straight into my ass mind u
and i just got a fucking app status tracker update... not for UofU... my BP is so spiked rn
QuarrelsomeTurkey
18:29
does anyone know if bu ever releases after 5 pm
Lol @jupitersmoons It feels like UofU is screwing with us haha
fr like I know it"s Mountain Time but bestie we have less than half an hour before typical EOD
what we doing
Real
19:17
new COAs are out
19:37
Anyone know how long it takes to get aid package after getting admitted to UChicago or Northwestern?
I’d ask in the t14 chat bc lol it may be a bit until you can get someone who can answer that question here
21:19
@syddak: Oof tough spot. Congrats on the As. Did either indicate either via email/mail that they would be following up with aid, and if so, did they provide a time frame? It may be acceptable to email them and indicate seat deposits are fast approaching and you are curious if you can expect further info (aid) from the school to aid u in ur decision..
0:26
@UnderRepresentedTryhard: that’s a greater than sign. Meaning outside t14
0:27
Schools>t14
IrishDinosaur
13:38
I'm convinced USC doesn't really exist
IrishDinosaur
13:38
it's an elaborate hoax
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.