Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

cum curiis et bloodwitis

Read a random definition: Engel v. Vitale (1962)

A quick definition of cum curiis et bloodwitis:

Term: CUM CURIIS ET BLOODWITIS

Definition: In Scots law, cum curiis et bloodwitis means having the power to hold courts and impose fines for violent crimes. If someone buys property with this title, they have the authority to make decisions about matters related to the property.

A more thorough explanation:

CUM CURIIS ET BLOODWITIS

cum curiis et bloodwitis (pronounced "kum kyoor-ee-is et bluhd-wi-tis") is a Latin term used in Scots law. It refers to the power of holding courts and fining for blood. If property is disposed of cum curiis et bloodwitis, the purchaser of a barony is entitled to cumulative jurisdiction over barony matters.

An example of cum curiis et bloodwitis would be if a person purchased a barony with the stipulation that it was disposed of cum curiis et bloodwitis. This would give the purchaser the power to hold courts and fine individuals for crimes committed within the barony.

Another example would be if a person inherited a title that was disposed of cum curiis et bloodwitis. This would give them the power to hold courts and fine individuals for crimes committed within their jurisdiction.

These examples illustrate how cum curiis et bloodwitis grants the power of jurisdiction to the purchaser or inheritor of a barony or title.

cum curiis earumque exitibus | cum decimis inclusis et nunquam antea separatis

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 3 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
17:07
That's all anyone should've needed.
17:07
i am a 1 issue voter: national debt.
jackfrost11770
17:07
THERES A COP FUNERAL AND NOW THE BUSES ARENT RUNNING TO MY PLACE SO I HAVE TO WALK IN THE FREEZING COLD HOME
texaslawhopefully
17:07
Not to mention that he's completely thrown away liberalism and classic western political philosophy, but yk your eggs will be cheaper so it's worth it
how bad are these tariffs gonna get for us everyday consumers?
@jackfrost11770: FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUu
jackfrost11770
17:08
FUCK THE NYPD
WASP HAHAHAHAHHA
texaslawhopefully
17:08
Estimates are about 4k fruitbat
YRDSL
17:08
im a 1 issue voter - if i want someone to be elected i vote for them
woof
texaslawhopefully
17:08
I've seen some that could be as high as 7k though
17:08
@jackfrost11770: ya prolly don't buy any lotto tickets tonite
get on that trump coin before the rug pull lol
Dkk
17:09
@BigStrongBug: I don't consider myself a one issue voter but if I had to pick one it would be gender relations.
i am a one issue voter for the economy, which is why i voted harris
texaslawhopefully
17:10
Here's a fairly well respected estimate fruitybat: The proposed tariffs could cost consumers an additional $2,500 to $7,600 a year per household, according to estimates, said Jonathan Gold, vice president of supply chain and customs policy for the National Retail Federation.
i am a voter so i voted
17:11
Lol what does gender relations mean
17:11
Like are you anti gay marriage?
texaslawhopefully
17:11
@Dkk: So you care about gender relations over the Constitution, institutional stability, the economy, political norms, etc.?
blue collar trump voters are gonna blame anything but him anyway when the price of their household consumption goes through the roof. I wonder how they'll spin that narrative.
17:11
Or are you an all inclusive hater and include trans folks too
texaslawhopefully
17:12
Even if you have conservative social values you still shouldn't like Trump lol, but that's a whole diff convo
I love when people prefer putting not talking about gender in schools at the top of the agenda instead of dealing with school shootings
this is going to blow your mind but once you realize women and men are more similar than different you will drown in pussy or dick
17:12
@HopefullyInLawSchool: $45k @ KS is really good. $145k is to attend it is not a bad deal
facts knowledgeable
Also love how he put an EO to leave the Paris climate agreement in the midst of the LA wildfires and places who haven’t gotten snow in 15 years now getting storms
@llama: it would only be 17,000 ish per year
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.