Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

dangerous-tendency test

Read a random definition: UDITPA

A quick definition of dangerous-tendency test:

The dangerous-tendency test is a way to determine if a person or animal has a tendency to cause harm or injury. This test is often used in cases where a dog has bitten someone, to decide if the owner is responsible for the injury. It helps to determine if the owner knew or should have known that their animal was likely to cause harm.

A more thorough explanation:

Dangerous-Tendency Test

The dangerous-tendency test is a legal concept used to determine whether a person or animal has a propensity to cause harm or injury. This test is often used in cases involving dog bites, where the owner may be held liable for injuries caused by their animal. The test examines whether the animal has shown a tendency to be aggressive or dangerous in the past, and whether the owner knew or should have known about this behavior.

For example, if a dog has bitten someone in the past, this may be evidence of a dangerous tendency. If the owner knew about the dog's previous bite but failed to take reasonable precautions to prevent future bites, they may be held liable for any subsequent injuries caused by the dog.

Another example could be a person who has a history of violent behavior. If this person has a tendency to become aggressive and has a history of causing harm to others, this may be evidence of a dangerous tendency. If this person then causes harm to someone else, they may be held liable for their actions.

The dangerous-tendency test is used to determine whether a person or animal has a propensity to cause harm or injury. This test is important in cases where someone has been injured and the owner or responsible party may be held liable. By examining past behavior and whether the owner knew or should have known about any dangerous tendencies, the court can determine whether the owner was negligent in their actions. This test helps to ensure that owners take reasonable precautions to prevent harm to others and that they are held accountable if they fail to do so.

dangerous situation | danger-utility test

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.