Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

dangerous weapon

Read a random definition: family purpose doctrine

A quick definition of dangerous weapon:

Term: Dangerous Weapon

Definition: A dangerous weapon is something that can hurt someone very badly. It is against the law to have or use dangerous weapons, especially when committing a crime. Dangerous weapons are different from deadly weapons, which are usually guns or things that can kill people. Dangerous weapons can be anything that can cause serious harm, even if it's not meant to be deadly. For example, a wooden gun can be considered a dangerous weapon if it makes people feel scared.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: A dangerous weapon is an object that can cause serious harm or injury to someone. Possession or use of dangerous weapons is often illegal under federal and state laws. Crimes committed with dangerous weapons usually result in higher sentencing. The term "dangerous weapon" is broader than "deadly weapon," which usually refers to guns and other lethal objects. Dangerous weapons can include objects that are not inherently lethal but can still cause harm.

Examples:

  • A knife
  • A baseball bat
  • A stun gun
  • A wooden gun

The first three examples are objects that are commonly recognized as dangerous weapons. They can cause serious harm or injury if used improperly or with intent to harm someone. The fourth example, a wooden gun, may not seem like a dangerous weapon at first glance. However, in McLaughlin v. United States, the Supreme Court found that a wooden gun could be considered a dangerous weapon if it created fear of danger. This illustrates how the definition of a dangerous weapon can be broader than just objects that are inherently lethal.

damages | Darby v. United States (1941)

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
Can y'all help me understand something lol. What does it mean for an app to "go complete"? Is that when the school has reviewed it and made a decision?
13:35
Na, it's when they have all the required information
Gotcha. So what would be the difference between received and completed?
Does complete entail like the app + LORs?
13:35
correct
That makes sense. Thank you!
13:36
complete basically means they've acknowledged receipt and it's ready to go under review whenever they start the deliberative process
Quillinit
13:40
I still haven't had Chicago or Cornell go complete, but I think that's just how they be
13:41
when did you submit
CaringEquableGuppy
13:42
How do you know when an application is complete? Is it on LSAC or the school's portal?
13:43
it'll be on the school-specific portal
Quillinit
13:44
when they opened
Quillinit
13:45
they both say something along the lines of "received and waiting to be processed"
13:48
anyone have good resources for revising a personal statement for reuse after applying with it last cycle?
13:49
Any guesses when Cornell and Penn CRS fee waivers will go out?
13:51
@Quillinit: from my recollection, chicago and cornell collapse complete/UR1 into a single step, so they may simply not be ready to begin reviewing applications
13:52
i think it's fair to assume, barring a handful of schools like UVA, most schools won't begin reviewing applications in earnest until the beginning of next month at the earliest, so it wouldn't be surprising to hear that applications are just sitting in the queue
13:54
@oakenrays: I was just gonna write a new one personally but I think you want to make it recognizably different from your previous PS
13:56
@baddestbunny: definitely agree that some revision and additional information is warranted but, my why law is the same... I guess just tell the same story in a different way
14:03
ugh fineeee I'll write a new stupid essay
14:07
yeah I told my last essay about a formative experience and am trying to update it now to be about what I’ve learned since that experience
recently wrapped up interview
i re-wrote my PS this cycle when I reapplied
fire drill at work
so lit
Quillinit
15:10
oh fun @info-man, Chicago just changed to complete today, so we'll see
boglue
15:23
do you have to have lawhub advantage for the lsd status checker to work
lawhub kind of a freaky ass name now that i think about it
16:22
The reason why today’s Image-Fiction isn’t the rescue from a passive, addictive TV-psychology that it tries so hard to be is that most Image-Fiction writers render their material with the same tone of irony and self-consciousness that their ancestors, the literary insurgents of Beat and postmodernism, used so effectively to rebel against their own world and context. And the reason why this irreverent postmodern approach fails to help the new Imagists transfigure TV is simply that TV has beaten the new Imagists to the punch.
Quillinit
16:26
idk lsd status checker button hasn't worked for me this whole cycle so far
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.