Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

de diversis regulis juris antiqui

Read a random definition: favor testamenti

A quick definition of de diversis regulis juris antiqui:

DE DIVERSIS REGULIS JURIS ANTIQUI: This is a Latin term that means "of various rules of ancient law". It is a part of Roman law and is the last title in the Digest, which contains 211 maxims. A digest is like an index of legal propositions that shows which cases support each proposition. It is used to make the contents of reports available and to separate, from the great mass of caselaw, those cases bearing on some specific point. The American Digest System covers the decisions of all American courts of last resort, state and federal, from 1658 to present. In simpler terms, it is a book that summarizes the laws and cases that have been decided in the past to help people understand the law better.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: De diversis regulis juris antiqui is a Latin term that means "of various rules of ancient law." It refers to the last title in the Digest, which contains 211 maxims in Roman law.

Example: The Digest is a collection of summaries of reported cases, arranged by subject and subdivided by jurisdiction and court. The purpose of a digest is to make the contents of reports available and to separate, from the great mass of caselaw, those cases bearing on some specific point. For example, the American Digest System covers the decisions of all American courts of last resort, state and federal, from 1658 to present.

Explanation: De diversis regulis juris antiqui is a term that refers to a specific section of the Digest, which is a compilation and systematic statement of various areas of law. The Digest contains summaries of reported cases, arranged by subject and subdivided by jurisdiction and court. The purpose of a digest is to make the contents of reports available and to separate, from the great mass of caselaw, those cases bearing on some specific point. The American Digest System is an example of a digest that covers the decisions of all American courts of last resort, state and federal, from 1658 to present.

dedition | de dolo malo

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
U kno even tho their circuit numbers don't compare to other schools, those #s are better than expected tbh
40-50 fed clerks is pretty cool
texaslawhopefully
20:29
That’s fair. Chicago though: https://www.law.uchicago.edu/clerkships
That's sweet. Again tho, unclear with Fedsoc tho. But u sounded like ur willing to go Fedsoc so ur set
lilypadfrog
20:31
yeah Tex is a fedsoc guy iirc
lilypadfrog
20:31
Is it really like no clerkship benefit at Chicago if you’re not conservative?
lilypadfrog
20:31
that seems crazy #tome
texaslawhopefully
20:32
No, at least from the two people I know there that’s false. I think it’s just something like Chicago for conservatives is on par with S whereas for liberals it’s below HYS but above CCNP
texaslawhopefully
20:32
I mean I think even the student body there only like 15 percent is part of fedsoc
It's more just not a good # for people who aren't willing to clerk conservative. I'm sure they place liberal clerks at an above average rate for a t-6 though. Maybe higher (not entirely sure)
texaslawhopefully
20:34
Page 14 has ideological splits by school: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/msen/files/law-prof-ideology.pdf
texaslawhopefully
20:35
Chicago/UVA are more to the right but not by an exceedingly large difference
lilypadfrog
20:36
I feel like UVA doesn’t have that reputation the way Chicago does. That’s interesting. Thanks tex
yeah I've heard about uva being conservative
siroracle
20:48
Yeah it’s only 75 percent lib that’s pretty terrifying
Dkk
20:53
lmfao
20:59
@siroracle: funny cause true
@siroracle: don't you have a bridge to be under?
shouldn't you be collecting tolls
21:00
trolololol
atwatodbit
21:04
anyone know much about mich clerking
atwatodbit
21:05
ive tried to learn more about it but its hard to cut through stuff. numbers wise they look good?
21:06
this website is a good research tool for outcomes: https://app.lawhub.org/schools
atwatodbit
21:06
@llama: thanks!
21:06
yah
Dkk
21:10
Anyone else read the Antioch shooters manifesto today. Pretty crazy stuff.
21:14
sad
YRDSL
21:31
@texaslawhopefully: it's pretty funny how even in law journal articles people can't stop confusing Penn with Penn State
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.