Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

de estrepamento

Read a random definition: capitalis justiciarius totius Angliae

A quick definition of de estrepamento:

De estrepamento is a legal term that refers to a writ used in the past to prevent a tenant from damaging or wasting land while a lawsuit to recover the land was pending against them. This writ was abolished because it was only used as an auxiliary to a real action to recover land, and equity provided the same relief through injunction. Estrepement is a type of waste that involves stripping or devastating land to the detriment of the reversioner, especially during a lawsuit for possession.

A more thorough explanation:

DE ESTREPAMENTO

De estrepamento is a legal term that refers to a writ used to prevent a tenant from causing damage to a property while a lawsuit to recover the land is pending against them. It was only used as an auxiliary to a real action to recover land and was abolished by 3 & 4 Will. 4, ch. 27 because equity provided the same relief through injunction.

Estrepement is a type of waste that involves stripping or devastating land to the detriment of the reversioner, especially during a lawsuit for possession.

An example of de estrepamento would be if a tenant was being sued for possession of a property, but in the meantime, they started cutting down all the trees on the land, causing damage to the property. The writ of de estrepamento would be used to prevent the tenant from causing further damage until the lawsuit was resolved.

An example of estrepement would be if a tenant was being sued for possession of a property, but in the meantime, they started digging up the land and removing valuable minerals, causing damage to the property. This would be considered a type of waste and could be prevented through the use of a writ of de estrepamento.

These examples illustrate how de estrepamento was used to prevent tenants from causing damage to a property while a lawsuit for possession was pending. It was a way to protect the property and ensure that it was not further damaged before the lawsuit was resolved.

de estoveriis habendis | de eu et trene

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
WASP HAHAHAHAHHA
texaslawhopefully
17:08
Estimates are about 4k fruitbat
YRDSL
17:08
im a 1 issue voter - if i want someone to be elected i vote for them
woof
texaslawhopefully
17:08
I've seen some that could be as high as 7k though
17:08
@jackfrost11770: ya prolly don't buy any lotto tickets tonite
get on that trump coin before the rug pull lol
Dkk
17:09
@BigStrongBug: I don't consider myself a one issue voter but if I had to pick one it would be gender relations.
i am a one issue voter for the economy, which is why i voted harris
texaslawhopefully
17:10
Here's a fairly well respected estimate fruitybat: The proposed tariffs could cost consumers an additional $2,500 to $7,600 a year per household, according to estimates, said Jonathan Gold, vice president of supply chain and customs policy for the National Retail Federation.
i am a voter so i voted
17:11
Lol what does gender relations mean
17:11
Like are you anti gay marriage?
texaslawhopefully
17:11
@Dkk: So you care about gender relations over the Constitution, institutional stability, the economy, political norms, etc.?
blue collar trump voters are gonna blame anything but him anyway when the price of their household consumption goes through the roof. I wonder how they'll spin that narrative.
17:11
Or are you an all inclusive hater and include trans folks too
texaslawhopefully
17:12
Even if you have conservative social values you still shouldn't like Trump lol, but that's a whole diff convo
I love when people prefer putting not talking about gender in schools at the top of the agenda instead of dealing with school shootings
this is going to blow your mind but once you realize women and men are more similar than different you will drown in pussy or dick
17:12
@HopefullyInLawSchool: $45k @ KS is really good. $145k is to attend it is not a bad deal
facts knowledgeable
Also love how he put an EO to leave the Paris climate agreement in the midst of the LA wildfires and places who haven’t gotten snow in 15 years now getting storms
@llama: it would only be 17,000 ish per year
17:15
yeah and i think after 1L u get in state? not certain
I dont think so based on my very brief research
17:16
hmm I know some school offer that in their offer (I also believe KS does not negotiate) but I wonder which schools would reconsider with a condition of in state after 1L yr?
Dkk
17:17
@texaslawhopefully: Not necessarily but I believe what Aristotle used to say. He used to say you could not have a functioning political system if you can not get gender relations right. Or essentially that.
KS does negotiate! I got an email saying theyre doing it for the first time this year
its rather limited but its not nothing
17:18
@HopefullyInLawSchool: noted, thanks for the intel. I know we joke around but all things conidered, KS is goated
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.