Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

de haerede deliberando illi qui habet custodiam terrae

Read a random definition: totidem verbis

A quick definition of de haerede deliberando illi qui habet custodiam terrae:

Term: DE HAEREDE DELIBERANDO ILLI QUI HABET CUSTODIAM TERRAE

Definition: De haerede deliberando illi qui habet custodiam terrae is a legal term that refers to a writ used in the past to order the sheriff to give an heir to the person who had wardship of the land. In simpler terms, it was a document that allowed someone who was responsible for taking care of a piece of land to receive the rightful heir to that land.

A more thorough explanation:

DE HAEREDE DELIBERANDO ILLI QUI HABET CUSTODIAM TERRAE

De haerede deliberando illi qui habet custodiam terrae is a legal term in Latin that means "for delivering an heir to him who has wardship of the land." It refers to a writ that orders the sheriff to deliver an heir to a person who had wardship.

An example of de haerede deliberando illi qui habet custodiam terrae would be if a landowner died and left a minor child as their heir. The person who had wardship of the land, such as a guardian or trustee, would need to obtain a writ to have the sheriff deliver the heir to them so they could manage the land on the child's behalf.

Another example would be if a landowner died without leaving a will or any known heirs. In this case, the person who had wardship of the land would need to obtain a writ to have the sheriff deliver any potential heirs to them so they could determine who should inherit the land.

These examples illustrate how de haerede deliberando illi qui habet custodiam terrae was used in medieval times to ensure that land was properly managed and passed down to the rightful heirs.

degree of relationship | de haerede rapto et abducto

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
18:40
wait why??
18:40
I haven’t watched them
18:41
just cus i wanted to hear ab i could relate too more instead of people that sound like way better candidates than me
18:42
what makes them better candidates than you?
18:43
they all had like 175's and either really strong professor recs or like owned a business
18:43
or other extracurricular stuff
18:43
strong professor recs is BS who cares
18:44
i hope
18:44
they can see when u cancel ur score right
18:44
yeah
18:44
thats so embarrising
18:44
fuck me
18:44
i hope i am remembering it way worse
18:44
lmao yeah i think in most circumstances you shouldn’t cancel cuz they might assume the score is worse than it was
18:45
remembering the lsat?
18:45
yur
18:45
I’ve been doing that too you’ll be fine
18:45
i just saw that some kids a year below me in high school are starting at good ass schools too fuckkk
18:46
what are good ass schools to you?
18:46
do u have a dream school?
18:46
well i saw one is at fordham and one is at upenn and ik fordham isnt t14 but its better than temple and villanova
18:47
dream is duke
18:47
ooh interesting choice why Duke?
18:48
i got into fordham and so did the dumbass I was dating for like two months it’s not that hard
18:48
by which I mean if they let him in I don’t trust their standards
18:49
my dad went to duke law so i have been a fan forever
18:49
Duke is fun. I took a trip there when I was 19 or so. Really good time when I was a young rapscallion.
18:49
and ik i just dont think i gave myself enough time for a guaranteed 170+ performance
18:49
I didnt see if anyone answered my UGA question. Did anyone answer it?
18:53
@Dkkm11: are you not still a young rapscallion?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.