Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

de haerede deliberando illi qui habet custodiam terrae

Read a random definition: negative prescription

A quick definition of de haerede deliberando illi qui habet custodiam terrae:

Term: DE HAEREDE DELIBERANDO ILLI QUI HABET CUSTODIAM TERRAE

Definition: De haerede deliberando illi qui habet custodiam terrae is a legal term that refers to a writ used in the past to order the sheriff to give an heir to the person who had wardship of the land. In simpler terms, it was a document that allowed someone who was responsible for taking care of a piece of land to receive the rightful heir to that land.

A more thorough explanation:

DE HAEREDE DELIBERANDO ILLI QUI HABET CUSTODIAM TERRAE

De haerede deliberando illi qui habet custodiam terrae is a legal term in Latin that means "for delivering an heir to him who has wardship of the land." It refers to a writ that orders the sheriff to deliver an heir to a person who had wardship.

An example of de haerede deliberando illi qui habet custodiam terrae would be if a landowner died and left a minor child as their heir. The person who had wardship of the land, such as a guardian or trustee, would need to obtain a writ to have the sheriff deliver the heir to them so they could manage the land on the child's behalf.

Another example would be if a landowner died without leaving a will or any known heirs. In this case, the person who had wardship of the land would need to obtain a writ to have the sheriff deliver any potential heirs to them so they could determine who should inherit the land.

These examples illustrate how de haerede deliberando illi qui habet custodiam terrae was used in medieval times to ensure that land was properly managed and passed down to the rightful heirs.

degree of relationship | de haerede rapto et abducto

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
why would you withdraw girl
15:38
@ImpartialLion: nah cuz there’s no way of knowing if they would’ve sent u an II later on
15:38
Isn’t uchicago like Top 4 tho
choosingpeace
15:38
@cumsock: they said there's like nothing to do there lol
choosingpeace
15:38
ive never been so i was just like ohhh
texaslawhopefully
15:38
UChicago is number one
^ period
u know it was a double thing. I missed II and my gf didn't want to live in the midwest anymore
15:39
But it’s fucking uchicago thooo LOL
15:39
I
15:40
Makes sense tho
cumsock
15:40
@choosingpeace: there’s plenty to do in Philly 😂 it’s a giant city
So after missing the II, I was like whatever. Maybe it's a sign to withdraw
nah making decisions off the gf is out of pocket
nahhhhh we been together since 10th grade
texaslawhopefully
15:40
I guess it depends what your goals are. If it's generic biglaw, CLS will get you the same outcome
6 yrs on January 30th
lilypadfrog
15:40
awwww <3 i love love
I also like CLS for liberal clerking. approx 41 FCOA clerks per yr
It's there if I excel. if not then I'm chill with sticking to BL
texaslawhopefully
15:41
CLS is not even close to Chicago for clerking lmao
choosingpeace
15:41
wait would yall pick CLS or penn?
I didn't apply to either but I would pick penn
15:42
penn bc im in state
no no it's not. But I wouldn't clerk conservative, so idk about Chi #s for myself
cumsock
15:42
Penn
texaslawhopefully
15:42
I guess that's fair. From what I've heard UChicago for conservatives is on par w/ HYS for clerkships
texaslawhopefully
15:42
not sure about for liberals
cumsock
15:43
They’re very similar tho
cumsock
15:43
Both t6 ivies
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.