Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

de haerede deliberando illi qui habet custodiam terrae

Read a random definition: A/R

A quick definition of de haerede deliberando illi qui habet custodiam terrae:

Term: DE HAEREDE DELIBERANDO ILLI QUI HABET CUSTODIAM TERRAE

Definition: De haerede deliberando illi qui habet custodiam terrae is a legal term that refers to a writ used in the past to order the sheriff to give an heir to the person who had wardship of the land. In simpler terms, it was a document that allowed someone who was responsible for taking care of a piece of land to receive the rightful heir to that land.

A more thorough explanation:

DE HAEREDE DELIBERANDO ILLI QUI HABET CUSTODIAM TERRAE

De haerede deliberando illi qui habet custodiam terrae is a legal term in Latin that means "for delivering an heir to him who has wardship of the land." It refers to a writ that orders the sheriff to deliver an heir to a person who had wardship.

An example of de haerede deliberando illi qui habet custodiam terrae would be if a landowner died and left a minor child as their heir. The person who had wardship of the land, such as a guardian or trustee, would need to obtain a writ to have the sheriff deliver the heir to them so they could manage the land on the child's behalf.

Another example would be if a landowner died without leaving a will or any known heirs. In this case, the person who had wardship of the land would need to obtain a writ to have the sheriff deliver any potential heirs to them so they could determine who should inherit the land.

These examples illustrate how de haerede deliberando illi qui habet custodiam terrae was used in medieval times to ensure that land was properly managed and passed down to the rightful heirs.

degree of relationship | de haerede rapto et abducto

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
globalcitizen
10:14
Are we gonna do something about the mentally ill alcoholic veterans collecting 100% disability for fake ailments
TenFiftyILuvUGang
10:15
baby im a dog im a mutt
globalcitizen
10:15
Major drain on the American taxpayer
Mostlylegal
10:23
I need AA
are u allowed to work ur 1L?
[] c0bra1
10:42
depends on the school
[] c0bra1
10:42
most will either say no or say part time no more than x number of hours
10:51
Howard is ranked number 13 for big law
10:52
this is huge news
babycakes
11:01
i don’t think getting flown out is in the cards for me
[] c0bra1
11:03
im going crazy i think
Anyone get an email from LSAC that an app status changed but nothing changed? Talk about blue balls
11:06
that happens all the time
Anyone apply for Weil legal innovators and gotten their round 2 interview invite?
Bastards…
180letmein
11:08
@dirtyquackyak: congrats!
UnevenInstinctiveSeal
11:17
Is it weird to send an LOCI before getting a decision if its been months and most people who applied around the same time have heard back?
W&M wave
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
11:23
@UnevenInstinctiveSeal: yeah, typically schools prefer only to hear from you pre-decision if you have big updates to share
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
11:24
LOCI is intended to help them choose off the waitlist efficiently to fill any remaining spots in their class; they don't want to waste time and energy calling someone who isn't ready to drop everything and attend
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
11:27
What school?
UnevenInstinctiveSeal
11:30
GULC. It's been over 3 months since my interview and they told people in the WL session they were going to start admitting off the wailist in a few weeks...
UnevenInstinctiveSeal
11:30
meanwhile I have no decision
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
11:30
When was the WL session held?
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
11:34
It looks like GULC's seat deposit deadline is May 1, so it wouldn't surprise me if "in a few weeks" meant "around May 1"
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
11:35
I received my GULC II yesterday so they seem to still be genuinely considering applicants
UnevenInstinctiveSeal
11:37
yesterday. Based on the recap from reddit, Dean Andy told them to expect some movement from April 23-May 10.
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
11:43
I found a post just now that says he mentioned a first WL-->A wave around May 8. If I were you, as tough as it is, I would sit tight; they don't like to feel that applicants are hounding them (sucky system tho tbh)
UnevenInstinctiveSeal
11:45
It's my top choice so waiting has been really hard. I'm guessing at this point I'm on the cusp between WL or R
Mostlylegal
11:47
Andy also said he wouldnt be surprised if there was movement before seat deposits. Also to make sure to send a good loci. He said its basically another application cycle which doesnt make sense since preferential waitlist was supposed to be unranked?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.