Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

de haeretico comburendo

Read a random definition: call to order

A quick definition of de haeretico comburendo:

De haeretico comburendo was a law in England a long time ago that punished people who were found guilty of heresy, which means having beliefs that went against the official teachings of the church. If someone was convicted of heresy and refused to change their beliefs, or if they changed their beliefs but then went back to their old ways, they could be burned to death. This law was first passed in 1401 and was the first English law that punished heresy with death.

A more thorough explanation:

Term: de haeretico comburendo
Definition: De haeretico comburendo is a historical writ that ordered the execution of a convicted heretic who refused to recant or was convicted of heresy again after recanting. It was also the first English penal law against heresy, enacted in 1401. The law authorized the burning of defendants who relapsed or refused to abandon their heretical opinions.
Examples: In 1400, Sawtre was convicted of heresy before the Bishop of Norwich and recanted his heresy. He fell again into heresy and was condemned by the archbishop and his provincial Council as a relapsed heretic. On this conviction, the king issued a writ de haeretico comburendo. This case clearly shows that the common law recognized the rule of the canon law. The writ was not a writ of course, but issued only by the special direction of the king in council. The law was passed in 1401 and authorized the burning of defendants who relapsed or refused to abandon their heretical opinions.

de haerede rapto et abducto | deherison

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
I dont think so based on my very brief research
17:16
hmm I know some school offer that in their offer (I also believe KS does not negotiate) but I wonder which schools would reconsider with a condition of in state after 1L yr?
Dkk
17:17
@texaslawhopefully: Not necessarily but I believe what Aristotle used to say. He used to say you could not have a functioning political system if you can not get gender relations right. Or essentially that.
KS does negotiate! I got an email saying theyre doing it for the first time this year
its rather limited but its not nothing
17:18
@HopefullyInLawSchool: noted, thanks for the intel. I know we joke around but all things conidered, KS is goated
Dkk
17:18
@BigStrongBug: Nah aristotle only applies gender as a role which I think either sex could fulfill. My issue with Trump's EO to limit things to only sex but I am fine with him doing it for now.
Yeah and Aristotle old as hell boy he would’ve died of hysteria after learning what the internet and tiktok is
Dkk
17:19
@SplitterusClitterus: I think some school shootings could have been prevented if gender relations were better.
Very few of any,, none come to my mind tbh
17:19
@llama: hi
They all seem like mental health and access to gun issues
Not mental health regarding gender and usually it’s a gun kids get right in the house
JumpySubsequentDolphin
17:20
SPLITTYYYYY
DOLPHYYY HIIIII
My love
@llama: thanks! ya KU is a very serious school on my list, but we'll see how the cards play out
Hi splitty hi jumpy!
Irish dinosaur whatuoppplp r u new
No this is taradactyl
17:21
@IrishDinosaur: congratz on UCLA!!
Everyone is changing their name omgggg hi tatadajaucuoly
Dkk
17:21
@SplitterusClitterus: Well, I would say almost every one of them. Either due to more stable households, community connections or even better treatment of those going through divorced and whatnot. Almost every shooter has at least one of these elements included with their reasons for killing.
texaslawhopefully
17:21
@Dkk: No. Aristotle said the family was the fundamental political unit, which is different than what you're saying. But, more to the point, the American political system exists vis-a-vis to 17/18th century political thought, or classical liberalism. Of which the central assumption is that the highest end is social choice.
OMG WHYSTAYAYAYAYA VONGRATSS ON UFLAAA WHATT CONGRATS
Dkk
17:21
@texaslawhopefully: he said more than one thing.
Thanks y’all! I’m pumped about it
texaslawhopefully
17:22
@Dkk: Yes, and he never said what you said he said. The closest he gets to that is that the family is the fundamental political unit.
texaslawhopefully
17:23
And that's discussed pretty clearly in Book I of The Politics.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.