Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

de haeretico comburendo

Read a random definition: abstract

A quick definition of de haeretico comburendo:

De haeretico comburendo was a law in England a long time ago that punished people who were found guilty of heresy, which means having beliefs that went against the official teachings of the church. If someone was convicted of heresy and refused to change their beliefs, or if they changed their beliefs but then went back to their old ways, they could be burned to death. This law was first passed in 1401 and was the first English law that punished heresy with death.

A more thorough explanation:

Term: de haeretico comburendo
Definition: De haeretico comburendo is a historical writ that ordered the execution of a convicted heretic who refused to recant or was convicted of heresy again after recanting. It was also the first English penal law against heresy, enacted in 1401. The law authorized the burning of defendants who relapsed or refused to abandon their heretical opinions.
Examples: In 1400, Sawtre was convicted of heresy before the Bishop of Norwich and recanted his heresy. He fell again into heresy and was condemned by the archbishop and his provincial Council as a relapsed heretic. On this conviction, the king issued a writ de haeretico comburendo. This case clearly shows that the common law recognized the rule of the canon law. The writ was not a writ of course, but issued only by the special direction of the king in council. The law was passed in 1401 and authorized the burning of defendants who relapsed or refused to abandon their heretical opinions.

de haerede rapto et abducto | deherison

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.