Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

de statuto stapulae

Read a random definition: d'office

A quick definition of de statuto stapulae:

Term: DE STATUTO STAPULAE

Definition: De statuto stapulae is a legal term that refers to a writ used to seize the property of and imprison a person who fails to repay a commercial debt. It is also a bond for commercial debt that gives the lender a possessory right in the land of a debtor who fails to repay a loan. This type of bond was popular after 1285 and allowed the borrower to charge their land and goods without giving up possession. If the borrower failed to pay, the lender became a tenant of the land until satisfied. The borrower remained in possession of their land under a statute or recognizance, and it later became a common practice under the common-law forms of mortgage to allow the mortgagor to remain in possession as a tenant at will or at sufferance of the mortgagee.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: De statuto stapulae (dee stə-tyoo-toh stay-pə-lee) is a legal term that refers to a writ used to seize the property of and imprison a person who forfeits a statute-staple bond.

Example: If a person borrows money and pledges their land as collateral, they may sign a statute-staple bond. If they fail to repay the loan, the lender can use a de statuto stapulae writ to seize the land and imprison the borrower.

Explanation: The example illustrates how de statuto stapulae was used to enforce statute-staple bonds. These bonds were a form of security for commercial debt, and they gave the lender a possessory right in the land of a debtor who failed to repay a loan. The writ allowed the lender to take legal action to recover the debt and seize the property of the borrower.

De statuto stapulae is a term that is commonly used in legal history and may not be familiar to high school students. However, the example and explanation provided can help students understand the concept of statute-staple bonds and how they were enforced in medieval England.

de statuto mercatorio | destination

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.