Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

declaration against interest

Read a random definition: debit

A quick definition of declaration against interest:

Declaration against interest: When someone says something that goes against their own interests, it can be used as evidence in court. This is called a declaration against interest. It's allowed because people usually don't say things that hurt themselves unless they're true. To use this kind of evidence, the person who said it has to be unavailable to testify, and the statement has to hurt their own case or help the other side's case. There also has to be other evidence that makes the statement believable. But if the person was forced to say it, the statement might not be allowed in court.

A more thorough explanation:

Declaration against interest is a statement made by someone who is not available to testify in court. The statement is against their own financial, property, or legal interests when it was made. This type of statement is an exception to the hearsay rule, which usually prevents out-of-court statements from being used in court because they may not be trustworthy.

The reason why a declaration against interest is an exception to the hearsay rule is that people usually do not say things that are against their interests unless they are true. Policymakers allow this exception because these statements can be important in cases where a witness is not available to testify.

In order for a statement to be considered a declaration against interest, it must meet certain requirements. First, the person who made the statement must not be available to testify in court. Second, the statement must be harmful to the person who made it or helpful to the other party in the case. Lastly, in a criminal case, there must be other evidence that makes the statement more trustworthy.

For example, if someone said that they had been drinking before they got into a car accident, that statement would be against their own interests in a driving under the influence case. This type of statement could be used as evidence in court if the person who made the statement is not available to testify.

Another example would be if someone wrote a letter admitting to a crime and then died before the trial. The letter could be considered a declaration against interest and could be used as evidence in court.

Overall, a declaration against interest is a statement made by someone who is not available to testify in court that is against their own interests when it was made. This type of statement is an exception to the hearsay rule and can be used as evidence in court if it meets certain requirements.

declaration | declaration of mailing

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.