Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

hearsay rule

Read a random definition: Uniform Transfers to Minors Act

A quick definition of hearsay rule:

The hearsay rule is a rule that says you can't use someone's words or statements that they said outside of court as evidence in court. This is because the other side can't ask the person who said those things any questions to make sure they are true. There are some exceptions to this rule, like if someone said something right when it happened or if it's a record of a business. But in general, you can't use hearsay as evidence in court.

A more thorough explanation:

The hearsay rule is a legal rule that says you can't use statements made outside of court as evidence in court. This is because the person who made the statement isn't there to be questioned about it.

For example, if someone says "I saw John steal the money" outside of court, that statement would be hearsay if someone tried to use it as evidence in court. This is because the person who made the statement isn't there to be questioned about what they saw.

However, there are some exceptions to the hearsay rule. For example, if someone makes a statement about their current state of mind, like "I'm feeling really scared right now," that statement might be allowed in court because it's not being used to prove something that happened in the past.

Another exception is the business records exception. This means that records kept by a business, like receipts or invoices, might be allowed in court even if the person who made the record isn't there to testify about it.

It's important to follow the hearsay rule because it helps ensure that evidence presented in court is reliable and can be questioned by both sides.

hearsay | heat of passion

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
15:58
Im hoping UCI wants to accept me ED, i see others with t14 options and it makes me disappointed
im hoping nyu comes thru
that would be awesome
@ImpartialLion: did you write a why Chicago?
babycat
15:59
@ImpartialLion: I heard they're interviewing more selectively this year
babycat
15:59
Only people they're seriously considering
I did! Don't wanna dox myself. But essentially my PS was about a situation with my parents n going thru college completely independently. Wrote ab family in Chicago who provided me with a home during some turbulent times. I thought it was a decent Why Chicago
But maybe not lmao
@texaslawhopefully: aw im sorry to hear tht. i also rsn out of messages AGAIN AND I JUST GOT HERE...im asking cuz i cant find something on the app tht i thought maybe one of yall knew.
@ImpartialLion: yeah, that does sound good. I'm sure will get a II soon
mine was very generic and we have similar numbers
babycat
16:02
I like that Chicago specifically says don't recite shit from our website
I'm hoping so. I feel like my PS might've been too personal or too whiney. I feel like it either hits or totally whiffs depending on who reads it
UVA loved it, but HLS and Chicago don't seem to love it as much
hey UVA hates me, so the process is fairly random
babycat
16:04
end of cycle everyone posts their PS
It's so random.
babycat
16:04
it's like flashing
@babycat: FRRR
Create a google folder and throw that shit in
I will probably add a link to all my materials end of cycle
I never thought about it but I think I will too
16:05
GULC would be about 5:30 right
JumpySubsequentDolphin
16:08
if washu admissions emails me one more time i might delete my lsac account
Dkk
16:08
Lol, the Cornell waitlist wave. Get fucked.
Dkk
16:08
That fucking sucks.
snow
16:08
lowkey im going to be optimistic. i just saw that some people applied early sept. and got II for schools in January
@JumpySubsequentDolphin: I've been tempted to put them in spam
snow
16:08
lmaooo dk
dk praying on all our downfall
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.