Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

defamation

Read a random definition: delatura

A quick definition of defamation:

Defamation is when someone says or writes something that hurts another person's reputation. It can be spoken (called slander) or written (called libel). To prove defamation, the person who was hurt must show that the statement was false, that other people heard or read it, that the person who said or wrote it was careless or meant to hurt them, and that they suffered harm because of it. Different states have different laws about defamation, and some statements are considered defamatory no matter what. There are also defenses to defamation, like telling the truth or having a special reason to say something that might otherwise be defamatory.

A more thorough explanation:

Defamation is when someone says or writes something that hurts another person's reputation. It can be either spoken (slander) or written (libel). Each state has its own laws about defamation, and the rules for what counts as defamation and how much someone can be compensated for it can vary.

To prove that someone has defamed them, a person must show four things:

  1. A false statement that is presented as fact
  2. The statement was communicated to someone else
  3. The person who made the statement was at least negligent (meaning they should have known it was false)
  4. The statement caused harm to the person's reputation

For example, if someone writes on social media that a person is a thief, and that statement is not true, it could be considered defamation. If someone tells a group of people that a business owner is dishonest, and that statement is not true, it could also be considered defamation.

Each state has its own laws about what counts as defamation and how much someone can be compensated for it. For example, in New York, a court will look at whether a statement could be considered defamatory. However, many courts will still allow a case to go forward even if the statement is not clearly defamatory, as long as the person who made the statement should have known it was false.

Most states assume that someone who defames another person did it on purpose. However, in some states, the person who was defamed must prove that the person who made the statement was at least negligent (meaning they should have known it was false).

If the person who was defamed is a public official, they must prove that the person who made the statement did it with "actual malice" (meaning they knew it was false or didn't care if it was true or not). This is a higher standard than for other people who were defamed.

There are some defenses to defamation. For example, if the statement is true, it is not considered defamation. If the statement was made during a court proceeding, it is also not considered defamation. However, if the person who made the statement did it with actual malice, they may not be protected by these defenses.

defalcation | default

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.