Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

defense attorney

Read a random definition: M & A

A quick definition of defense attorney:

A defense attorney is a lawyer who helps someone who is being accused of doing something wrong. They work to protect the person's rights and make sure they are treated fairly in court. Defense attorneys can help in both criminal and civil cases. If someone cannot afford a lawyer, the court will provide a defense attorney to help them.

A more thorough explanation:

A defense attorney, also known as a defense lawyer, is a legal professional who represents a defendant in a lawsuit or criminal case. Their job is to defend their client's rights and interests in court.

In criminal cases, defense attorneys are formally referred to as "criminal defense attorneys." They represent defendants who have been accused of committing a crime. In civil cases, defense attorneys represent defendants who are being sued by another party.

Defense attorneys are hired by the defendant to represent them throughout the legal process, including trial. However, if a defendant cannot afford a lawyer, a defense attorney called a public defender is provided to the defendant by the court for representation.

  • A defense attorney represents a person who has been accused of robbery.
  • A defense attorney represents a company that is being sued for breach of contract.
  • A public defender is appointed to represent a defendant who cannot afford a lawyer in a criminal case.

These examples illustrate how defense attorneys represent defendants in both criminal and civil cases. They work to protect their client's rights and interests in court, whether they are an individual or a company. In some cases, a public defender is appointed to represent a defendant who cannot afford a lawyer.

defense | Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA)

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.