Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

dilution (trademark)

Read a random definition: VOCAL

A quick definition of dilution (trademark):

Dilution is when someone uses a famous brand name or logo in a way that confuses people or makes the famous brand less special. For example, if a company put a white apple logo on their appliances, people might think Apple made those appliances. This can harm the reputation of the famous brand. In the United States, there is a law called the Federal Trademark Dilution Act that protects famous brands from this kind of harm. If someone uses a famous brand name or logo in a way that is likely to cause confusion or harm the brand's reputation, the owner of the brand can ask them to stop.

A more thorough explanation:

In law, dilution refers to the use of a trademark or trade name in commerce that is similar enough to a famous mark that it confuses or diminishes the public's perception of the famous mark. This can happen in two ways:

  • Dilution by blurring: This occurs when the distinctiveness of a famous mark is impaired by association with another similar mark or trade name.
  • Dilution by tarnishment: This occurs when the reputation of a famous mark is harmed through association with another similar mark or trade name.

For example, if an appliance company puts white apple logos on their appliances, it could dilute the trademark of Apple by confusing consumers as to whether Apple began creating completely new items. This would be an example of dilution by blurring.

Many countries around the world provide dilution protection in some form as a part of trademark law. In the United States, the Federal Trademark Dilution Act (FTDA) creates a federal cause of action to protect famous marks from unauthorized use and to prevent dilution of the distinctive quality of such marks.

The owner of a famous mark is entitled to an injunction against another person who uses a mark or trade name in commerce that is likely to cause dilution of the famous mark regardless of the presence or absence of actual or likely confusion, of competition, or of actual economic injury.

To establish a claim of dilution, the mark must have become famous before use of the allegedly diluting mark or trade name began.

For example, if a new company started using a logo that was similar to the Nike swoosh, Nike could claim dilution because their mark was famous before the new company started using a similar logo.

The factors to be considered in determining whether a mark or trade name is likely to cause dilution by blurring include:

  • The degree of similarity between the mark or trade name and the famous mark
  • The degree of the famous mark's inherent or acquired distinctiveness
  • The extent to which the owner of the famous mark is engaged in substantially exclusive use of the mark
  • The degree of recognition of the famous mark
  • Whether the user of the mark or trade name intended to create an association with the famous mark
  • Any actual association between the mark or trade name and the famous mark

Certain uses of famous marks, such as fair use, are not actionable as dilution. Fair use includes use of the mark other than as a designation of source for the goods or services in connection with advertising or promotions that permit consumers to compare goods or services, and identifying and parodying, criticizing, or commenting on the owner of the mark or the goods or services connected with the mark.

For example, if a comedian made a joke about a famous brand of soda, they could use the brand name in their joke without being accused of dilution because it falls under fair use.

dilution | diminished capacity

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
MIAMI A
[] AromaticTroubledDormouse
20:55
How does one know if they are UR1 or UR2?
[] AromaticTroubledDormouse
20:56
CONGRATS MACAQUE!
TY
got a random stanford email and almost had a heart attack
ALSO CONGRATS!
Congrats1!
21:15
Miami A, yall I'm so excited I could cry.
21:15
Feel like I can finally stop holding my breath!! Whew!!!
[] baddestbunny
22:16
every time I get accosted by a strange man who follows me around because my male coworkers were too busy talking to walk me back to my car I get closer to saying we need to bring back traditional gender roles
Dkk
22:32
Nice! @Macaque
Dkk
22:32
@Aromatic, Have to guess.
Dkk
22:33
That sucks @Bunny do you have to go to the hospital?
[] baddestbunny
22:40
I said accosted not assaulted
23:35
guys. my notre dame address just went long is this good or bad
1a2b3c4d26z
23:37
Oooooo me too
23:37
omg is this good or bad
Dkk
23:47
Idk if gender roles are gunna fix that then.
23:49
it looks like most people who applied in october last cycle didn't get a decision until january... does it even mean anything that our addresses went long??
hows ED 2 compared to ED 1?
Dkk
0:10
No idea
windyMagician
0:34
reporting live to say my ndls address also went long
does it mean anything ^
Dkk
2:21
NDLS and Fordham took a very long time last year. It's good info for people to know.
[] baddestbunny
4:29
let’s get after it boys and girls
Dkk
5:21
I gtg to bed soon.
Dkk
5:22
Big day today. Gunna be a crazy one. I will sleep through the first half.
good morning lsd it is 5 am EST
also jazzy my ndls address went long ages ago i sadly do not think it means anything
my stanford address also went long LOL i think at most it's an indicator it's under review
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.