Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

diminution in value

Read a random definition: sudden-emergency doctrine

A quick definition of diminution in value:

Diminution in value is a way to figure out how much money someone should get if another person breaks a contract. It works by taking the value of what was promised in the contract and subtracting the value of what was actually delivered. For example, if someone promised to build a house worth $1,000,000 but only built one worth $700,000, the person who was supposed to get the house could get $300,000 in damages using diminution in value. This is different from other ways of figuring out damages, like getting money for things that went wrong because of the broken contract or making the person who broke the contract do what they promised.

A more thorough explanation:

Diminution in value is a way to calculate damages owed to a person who has been harmed by another party's breach of contract. This method calculates damages by subtracting the market value of the object of the contract as performed from the value of the contract as promised.

For example, if you hire a contractor to build a house for $500,000 and the contractor builds a house worth only $300,000, the damages calculated using diminution in value would be $200,000.

Diminution in value is different from other methods of calculating damages, such as reliance damages, consequential damages, and specific performance.

Overall, diminution in value is a way to ensure that the harmed party is compensated for the difference between what they were promised in the contract and what they actually received.

diminished capacity | diplomat

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.