Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

direct-action statute

Read a random definition: legal opinion

A quick definition of direct-action statute:

A direct-action statute is a law that allows someone who has been hurt to sue an insurance company directly instead of suing the person who caused the harm. This is helpful when the person who caused the harm cannot be found or served with legal papers. Some states have direct-action statutes, including Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Minnesota, New York, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.

A more thorough explanation:

A direct-action statute is a law that allows an injured party to sue an insurance company directly instead of suing the person who caused the injury. This means that the injured party can skip suing the person who caused the harm and go straight to the insurance company.

For example, in Rhode Island, if someone is injured and cannot serve the person who caused the injury with legal papers, they can still sue the insurance company directly under the state's direct-action statute. Other states that have direct-action statutes include Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Minnesota, New York, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.

These laws are meant to make it easier for injured parties to get compensation for their injuries. Instead of having to go through a long legal process to sue the person who caused the harm, they can go straight to the insurance company and get the money they need to pay for medical bills and other expenses.

direct action | direct adoption

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.