Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Directive on the Legal Protection of Databases

Read a random definition: self-stultification

A quick definition of Directive on the Legal Protection of Databases:

The Directive on the Legal Protection of Databases is a law made by the European Commission in 1996. It says that databases with original content should be protected by copyright, and those without original content should have a special kind of protection. This law is also called the Database Directive.

A more thorough explanation:

The Directive on the Legal Protection of Databases is a law created by the European Commission in 1996. It aims to provide a standard way of protecting databases that contain original content and those that do not.

For databases that contain original content, the Directive provides copyright protection. This means that the creator of the database has the exclusive right to use and distribute the content. For example, if someone creates a database of recipes, they have the right to prevent others from copying or distributing the recipes without their permission.

However, some databases may not qualify for copyright protection because their content is not original. In these cases, the Directive provides a sui generis system of protection. This means that the creator of the database has the exclusive right to prevent others from extracting or reusing a substantial part of the database. For example, if someone creates a database of public domain information, they may not have copyright protection, but they can still prevent others from copying a large portion of the database.

The Directive on the Legal Protection of Databases is important because it helps to protect the rights of creators and encourages innovation and creativity. It also helps to ensure that databases are used in a fair and legal way.

Directive on the Legal Protection of Computer Programs | direct line

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
16:44
Yeah, I would have definitely gone to the hotel if I knew they booked a room for me. At the very least, it would be proper to show up personally and explain your extraneous circumstances
Law-Shark
16:44
Nah but it's in your name. I went to an ASD. I asked the school for an extra night and they gave it to me. You just need to plan things better.
Law-Shark
16:45
This is like peak disconenct between the male and female brain.
16:45
i think that's where i was confused then
Law-Shark
16:45
disconnect*
Law-Shark
16:45
You live and you learn
16:45
because i did let one of the staff know i'd be leaving early and thought that would be enough
16:46
but i was confused why i got an e-mail with a room cuz I didn't ask for it at all
Law-Shark
16:46
Well, you know now what to do.
16:47
well on their end they prob shouldn't just be buying hotel rooms for ppl who don't request it and then getting mad I didn't go
16:48
goof
16:48
Did you get any materials for admitted students day explaining that they would be booking hotel rooms?
16:49
there was an opt in on the form but I didn't select yes
16:49
Hmm, that's weird
16:50
i think it's unprofessional of them to call you like what if you had an emergency and had to leave? why is it their business why you didn't stay? not like they're lacking money and $100.00 hotel room is gona make them bankrupt
16:50
i figured it was an error and I was on the road so I didn't read into it. plus it would make more sense for it to be the night before cuz it started at 9am? so I was like uhhh and paid it no mind
16:51
@bigfatsloth: that's what i'm saying, they were gonna pay no matter what
16:54
"This is like peak disconenct between the male and female brain." like bffr
16:55
It was probably an administrative error then. I can't imagine why they would book hotel rooms for people that didn't select yes. I would maybe follow up with them and apologize for the misunderstanding to avoid any awkwardness
Denny
16:56
who watch that arsenal game
16:56
I'm a Chelsea fan unfortunately
damn why are yall fighting i the lsd.law gc
Denny
17:14
@ET025: but ur not watching champions league?
Denny
17:15
declan rice did a madness
17:20
@Denny: Not today. Doing more LSAT studying this afternoon, but I saw that. I think Chelsea missed out on him. (this is probably more suited for OT)
Does anyone have experience getting their aid package reconsidered at WashU? How long does it take to hear back after sending the form?
MrThickRopes
21:01
fo pm gon be good to us tmrw
Mr ropes is hopeful again so I am too
21:33
lets go ropes
21:53
[deleted by starfishies]
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.