Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

discontinuous easement

Read a random definition: commission of appraisement and sale

A quick definition of discontinuous easement:

A discontinuous easement is a type of legal right that allows someone to use someone else's land for a specific purpose, like crossing it to get to a road. The land that benefits from the easement is called the dominant estate, while the land burdened by the easement is called the servient estate. Unlike owning land, an easement only gives the holder the right to use or control the land for a limited purpose. A discontinuous easement can only be used if the person claiming it deliberately acts in some way with regard to the servient estate, like using a right-of-way or drawing water.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: A type of easement that can only be enjoyed if the party claiming it deliberately acts in some way with regard to the servient estate. Examples include a right-of-way and the right to draw water. The land benefiting from an easement is called the dominant estate, while the land burdened by an easement is called the servient estate.

Examples:

  • A right-of-way that allows a neighbor to cross your property to access a public road is a discontinuous easement. The neighbor can only use the right-of-way if they deliberately act to cross your property.
  • The right to draw water from a well on a neighbor's property is another example of a discontinuous easement. The neighbor can only exercise this right if they deliberately act to draw water from the well.

These examples illustrate how a discontinuous easement requires a deliberate action by the party claiming it. Without this deliberate action, the easement cannot be enjoyed.

discontinuor | discontinuous servitude

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.