Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

discretionary power of appointment

Read a random definition: public-duty doctrine

A quick definition of discretionary power of appointment:

A discretionary power of appointment is a type of power that someone can have over a group of people. This power allows the person to choose who will receive something, like money or property, from a group of people who fit a certain description. The person with the power can choose to use it or not, but if they do use it, they have to do it in a way that makes sense and follows the wishes of the person who gave them the power. This power can be used in different ways, either by giving it to only one person or by giving it to multiple people.

A more thorough explanation:

A discretionary power of appointment is a type of power that is not mandatory to exercise. The person who has the power can choose whether or not to use it. The power is valid as long as there is at least one person who fits the description of the class that the power can be exercised in favor of (the objects of the power).

If the person with the power of appointment (the donee) decides to use the discretionary power, they must do so intelligently and in line with the decedent's purpose. The exercise of discretionary power can be either exclusive or non-exclusive.

For example, let's say a wealthy individual creates a trust for their grandchildren. The trust document gives the trustee the power to distribute the trust assets to the grandchildren as they see fit. This is a discretionary power of appointment because the trustee can choose whether or not to distribute the assets to the grandchildren.

Another example is if a person creates a will that gives their spouse the power to distribute their assets to their children as they see fit. This is also a discretionary power of appointment because the spouse can choose whether or not to distribute the assets to the children.

These examples illustrate the definition of discretionary power of appointment because in both cases, the person with the power can choose whether or not to exercise it. They must do so intelligently and in line with the decedent's purpose.

discretionary | discretionary trust

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.