Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

disparaging trademark

Read a random definition: retainer agreement

A quick definition of disparaging trademark:

A disparaging trademark is a word, phrase, logo, or symbol used by a company to distinguish its products from others, but it is offensive or insulting to a particular group of people. For example, a trademark that uses a racial slur or derogatory term would be considered disparaging. To be protected by law, a trademark must be unique and registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. However, if a trademark is found to be disparaging, it may not be eligible for protection.

A more thorough explanation:

A disparaging trademark is a type of trademark that is considered offensive or derogatory towards a particular group of people. It is a mark that may be deemed to be insulting or disrespectful to a certain race, ethnicity, religion, or gender.

For example, the Washington Redskins football team had a trademark that was considered disparaging towards Native Americans. The trademark was eventually cancelled by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in 2014.

Another example is the trademark for "Slants," a band made up of Asian-American musicians. The trademark was initially denied by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for being disparaging towards Asians, but was later approved by the Supreme Court in 2017.

These examples illustrate how a disparaging trademark can be controversial and may be subject to legal challenges. It is important for businesses to be aware of the potential implications of using a disparaging trademark and to consider alternative options for branding their products or services.

disparaging mark | disparity

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.