Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

disparaging mark

Read a random definition: deficiency suit

A quick definition of disparaging mark:

A disparaging mark is a type of trademark that is offensive or insulting to a particular group of people. Trademarks are words, logos, or symbols that companies use to identify their products and services. To be protected by law, a trademark must be unique and registered with the government. However, if a trademark is considered disparaging, it may not be protected. This means that other companies may be able to use the same or similar mark without facing legal consequences.

A more thorough explanation:

A disparaging mark is a type of trademark that is considered offensive or derogatory towards a particular group of people. It is a mark that may be considered discriminatory or insulting to a certain race, ethnicity, gender, religion, or sexual orientation.

For example, the Washington Redskins football team had a trademark for their name and logo, which many Native Americans found offensive. In 2017, the Supreme Court ruled that the trademark was disparaging and therefore could not be protected under federal law.

Another example is the trademark for the brand "Chink's Steaks," which was considered a racial slur towards Asian Americans and was eventually changed to "Joe's Steaks."

Disparaging marks are not protected under trademark law and can be challenged or cancelled if they are found to be offensive or discriminatory.

disparaging instruction | disparaging trademark

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.