Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

doctor-patient privilege

Read a random definition: acquisition of citizenship

A quick definition of doctor-patient privilege:

Doctor-patient privilege is when a patient talks to their doctor and the things they say are kept secret. This is to make sure that patients feel safe to share personal information about their health without worrying that other people will find out. The law says that doctors have to keep this information private, but there are some exceptions. For example, if a patient sues their doctor, they might have to share some of the information in court. Doctor-patient privilege is different from doctor-patient confidentiality, which is when a patient's medical records are kept private.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Doctor-patient privilege, also known as physician-patient privilege, refers to a confidential communication between a doctor and a patient that is protected from disclosure. This privilege is created by statutory language in most jurisdictions, but there are many exceptions that limit its protection. The purpose of this privilege is to allow patients to fully disclose confidential information about their illness without fear of compromising their privacy.

Examples:

  • In re Bess Z.: In this case, the court ruled that the doctor-patient privilege applied to a minor who had disclosed information about her sexual activity to her doctor. The court found that the privilege protected the minor's right to privacy and prevented the disclosure of sensitive information.
  • Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Peters' Bakery: In this case, the court ruled that the doctor-patient privilege did not apply to a bakery employee who had disclosed information about her medical condition to her employer. The court found that the employee had waived her privilege by disclosing the information to a third party.

These examples illustrate how the doctor-patient privilege can be applied in different situations. In the first case, the privilege protected the patient's right to privacy and prevented the disclosure of sensitive information. In the second case, the privilege did not apply because the patient had waived it by disclosing the information to a third party.

docket | doctrine

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.