Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

double-entry accounting

Read a random definition: legitimacy presumption

A quick definition of double-entry accounting:

Double-entry accounting is a way of keeping track of money that a business earns and spends. Every time the business gets or spends money, it is written down in two different places. This helps to make sure that mistakes are caught and it gives a clear picture of how the money is being used. The rule is that the amount of money the business has should always be the same as the amount of money it owes or owns.

A more thorough explanation:

Double-entry accounting is a way of keeping track of a business's money by recording every transaction twice, as a debit and a credit. This helps prevent mistakes and gives a more detailed picture of how money is being used.

For example, if a company pays $10,000 for rent, they would credit their cash account (subtracting $10,000) and debit their expenses account (adding $10,000). This way, the company can see exactly how much money they spent on rent and where it came from.

Another example would be if a company sells a product for $100. They would credit their revenue account (adding $100) and debit their inventory account (subtracting the cost of the product). This way, the company can see how much money they made from selling the product and how much it cost them to produce it.

The formula for double-entry accounting is assets = liabilities + equity. This means that a company's assets (what they own) should always be equal to their liabilities (what they owe) plus their equity (what they've invested in the company). If the numbers don't add up, there's been a mistake somewhere.

double wills | doubling

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.