Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

driving while intoxicated

Read a random definition: ICPC

A quick definition of driving while intoxicated:

Driving while intoxicated (DWI) is when someone drives a car after drinking too much alcohol. This is against the law because it can be very dangerous. Each state has a limit for how much alcohol can be in a person's blood while driving. If someone has more alcohol in their blood than the legal limit, they can be charged with DWI. Some states call it DUI instead. This is a serious crime and can result in fines, jail time, and losing the ability to drive.

A more thorough explanation:

Driving while intoxicated (DWI) is a crime that occurs when someone drives a motor vehicle after consuming enough alcohol to raise their blood alcohol content (BAC) above the legal limit. It is not necessary for the person to be completely drunk to be charged with DWI. Each state has its own laws that determine the level of BAC at which a person is considered to be under the influence of alcohol. For example, in New York, a driver can be charged with DWI if their BAC is .08 or higher, or if there is other evidence of intoxication. For commercial drivers, the limit is .04 BAC or other evidence of intoxication. Some states use the term DUI (Driving Under the Influence) instead of DWI, while others differentiate between the two charges, with DUI being a lesser offense.

  • A person goes to a bar and drinks several beers before getting behind the wheel of their car. They are pulled over by the police and their BAC is found to be .10. They are charged with DWI.
  • A commercial truck driver has a glass of wine with dinner before getting back on the road. They are pulled over for a routine inspection and the officer smells alcohol on their breath. A breathalyzer test shows their BAC is .05. They are charged with DWI.

These examples illustrate how DWI can occur when a person drives a vehicle after consuming alcohol and their BAC is above the legal limit. It is important to remember that driving while intoxicated is dangerous and can lead to serious consequences, including accidents, injuries, and even death.

driving while black | driving while intoxicated (DWI)

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.