Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

intoxication

Read a random definition: successor fiduciary

A quick definition of intoxication:

Intoxication is a defense used in criminal law cases. It means that the person who committed the crime was under the influence of drugs or alcohol and couldn't think clearly. There are two types of intoxication: voluntary and involuntary. Involuntary intoxication is when someone is given drugs or alcohol without knowing it, while voluntary intoxication is when someone chooses to take drugs or alcohol. Some states allow the defense of involuntary intoxication, but not voluntary intoxication. However, being under the influence of drugs or alcohol can also be a crime in itself, such as driving while intoxicated or public intoxication.

A more thorough explanation:

Intoxication is a defense that can be used in criminal law cases. It means that the defendant claims they should not be held responsible for a crime because they were not in the right state of mind due to being under the influence of drugs or alcohol.

There are two types of intoxication: voluntary and involuntary. Involuntary intoxication is when someone is given drugs or alcohol without their knowledge or consent. Voluntary intoxication is when someone willingly takes drugs or alcohol.

Some states only allow the defense of involuntary intoxication, while others allow both types. However, even in states that allow voluntary intoxication as a defense, it may only be used in certain circumstances.

For example, in California, voluntary intoxication can only be used as a defense in cases of specific intent crimes, where the defendant had to have a specific intention to commit the crime. It cannot be used to argue that the defendant did not know what they were doing was wrong.

Intoxication can also be a crime in itself, such as driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol or public intoxication.

For example, if someone is caught driving while drunk, they can be charged with a DWI/DUI violation. This means that they were driving while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, which is a crime.

These examples illustrate how intoxication can be both a defense and a crime, depending on the circumstances.

intimidation | intrinsic fraud

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
Mostlylegal
15:06
wbu?
15:07
oof
15:08
I am a rare case. I briefly attended a t14 and withdrew bc of mental health issues and am now scraping my way hopefully back in
Lmfao gotta have the most annoying life if an ex is stalking you on gddm lsd dot law
llama
15:23
Guys I opened a retirement acc yesterday and put $20k in there and now I have $10k, is that normal?
eggan
15:26
@WickedClam: not a safety but definitely apply to cardozo. last cycle i had similar stats to u and got in with a $150k scholly
eggan
15:27
also northeastern
DefinitelyRobbingBanks
15:28
@Mostlylegal: Are you leaving the cushy job for school, or will you try to work a bit?
@WickedClam: you can get some good money at a more rural(ish) school
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
15:30
Not trying to be negative, but 164 and 3.7 might not make schools ranked 30-50 "safeties" - use data on here 7sage, and elsewhere, but take with a grain of salt
MrThickRopes
15:31
Half a hour fo pm
ParallelAgreeableOrangutan
15:31
Definitely doable, but some might be closer to target/reach, especially if next cycle is similar to this one
i would apply to places like uiowa, mizzou, uarizona
MrThickRopes
15:32
Na bruh apply to Mickey Ds wit dat 164
LMAOOOOOOOOOO
15:33
hehe
DefinitelyRobbingBanks
15:34
Ropes, take your 165 having, crashing out every week ass self to Mickey D's
pls pls these law schools are already trying to kill us
we gotta uplift each other <3
i want a mcdongald
eggan
15:38
@ParallelAgreeableOrangutan: i didnt name 30-50 ranked schools, and also, i did say these werent safeties
15:38
makudonarudo
mcbobamdl
eggan
15:38
@Besmirchin: マクドナルド
15:39
@eggan: そうですね
was talking to an attorney who's 90 years old (ik) and he's like what the fuck is the lsat you just applied back when i wanted to go to law school
and i thought i was gonna pass out
15:40
@eggan: 日本人?
15:43
my boss keeps laughing about how he paid $1,500.00 for law school in the 70s at UTK
15:43
so funny lol ur so funny boss
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.