Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

intoxication

Read a random definition: prison

A quick definition of intoxication:

Intoxication is a defense used in criminal law cases. It means that the person who committed the crime was under the influence of drugs or alcohol and couldn't think clearly. There are two types of intoxication: voluntary and involuntary. Involuntary intoxication is when someone is given drugs or alcohol without knowing it, while voluntary intoxication is when someone chooses to take drugs or alcohol. Some states allow the defense of involuntary intoxication, but not voluntary intoxication. However, being under the influence of drugs or alcohol can also be a crime in itself, such as driving while intoxicated or public intoxication.

A more thorough explanation:

Intoxication is a defense that can be used in criminal law cases. It means that the defendant claims they should not be held responsible for a crime because they were not in the right state of mind due to being under the influence of drugs or alcohol.

There are two types of intoxication: voluntary and involuntary. Involuntary intoxication is when someone is given drugs or alcohol without their knowledge or consent. Voluntary intoxication is when someone willingly takes drugs or alcohol.

Some states only allow the defense of involuntary intoxication, while others allow both types. However, even in states that allow voluntary intoxication as a defense, it may only be used in certain circumstances.

For example, in California, voluntary intoxication can only be used as a defense in cases of specific intent crimes, where the defendant had to have a specific intention to commit the crime. It cannot be used to argue that the defendant did not know what they were doing was wrong.

Intoxication can also be a crime in itself, such as driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol or public intoxication.

For example, if someone is caught driving while drunk, they can be charged with a DWI/DUI violation. This means that they were driving while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, which is a crime.

These examples illustrate how intoxication can be both a defense and a crime, depending on the circumstances.

intimidation | intrinsic fraud

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.