Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

e-contract

Read a random definition: dreit dreit

A quick definition of e-contract:

An e-contract is an agreement made through electronic means, such as email or computer programs. It can be made between two or more people or between electronic agents. The rules for e-contracts are provided by the Uniform Computer Information Transactions Act, and traditional contract principles and remedies usually apply. To e-contract means to form a binding agreement using a computer or other electronic technology.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: An e-contract is a type of contract that is formed through electronic means, such as email or computer programs. It can be created by two or more individuals interacting electronically, or by an individual interacting with an electronic agent. E-contracts are governed by the same principles and remedies as traditional contracts.

Examples:

  • When you buy something online, you usually have to agree to the website's terms and conditions before you can complete your purchase. This is an example of an e-contract formed through the interaction of two individuals using electronic means.
  • If you use a chatbot to book a hotel room, the conversation you have with the chatbot may be considered an e-contract formed through the interaction of an individual with an electronic agent.
  • When two automated systems exchange data and recognize the existence of a contract, this is an example of an e-contract formed through the interaction of at least two electronic agents.

These examples illustrate how e-contracts can be formed in different ways, but they all involve electronic means of communication or interaction. E-contracts are becoming increasingly common in e-commerce, and it's important to understand the rules and principles that govern them.

e contra | e converso

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.