Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

economic espionage

Read a random definition: NTID

A quick definition of economic espionage:

Economic espionage is when someone steals important information about money, trade, or technology from a company or the government. They do this secretly and illegally. This can be very bad for the country because it can hurt the economy and national security. The government made a law called the Economic Espionage Act to punish people who do this. If someone is caught, they can go to jail for a long time and have to pay a lot of money. Sometimes people do this just to make money for themselves, and that's called corporate espionage.

A more thorough explanation:

Economic espionage is when someone illegally or secretly targets or acquires sensitive financial, trade, or economic policy information, proprietary economic information, or technological information. This can harm the economic stability of a country and individual companies. The primary law against economic espionage is the Economic Espionage Act of 1996 (EEA), which defines economic espionage as the theft or misappropriation of trade secrets and other intellectual property with the intent or knowledge that the offense will benefit a foreign government, foreign instrumentality, or foreign agent.

  • An employee of a U.S. company shares confidential technology with a foreign government, which could threaten national security.
  • A company steals trade secrets from a competitor to gain a competitive advantage in the market.

These examples illustrate how economic espionage can harm both national security and individual companies. The sharing of confidential technology with foreign governments can lead to a loss of competitive advantage and harm the overall economic growth of a country. The theft of trade secrets can also harm individual companies by giving competitors an unfair advantage in the market.

The punishment for economic espionage can be severe. Individuals can face up to 15 years in prison and up to $5 million in fines, while companies can face fines up to three times the value of the misappropriated information. However, the prosecution must prove that the person knew the information was a trade secret and intended to benefit a foreign government. Individuals who do not intend to benefit a foreign government but still intend to misappropriate trade secrets can be punished under § 1832 of the EEA.

economic efficiency | Economic Stimulus Act of 2008

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.