Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

editorial privilege

Read a random definition: silent record

A quick definition of editorial privilege:

Editorial privilege is a legal right that protects journalists from being forced to reveal their sources or confidential information. It is a type of journalist's privilege that allows them to keep their sources anonymous and protect their freedom of speech. This privilege is important for journalists to be able to report on important issues without fear of retaliation or legal action.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Editorial privilege is a type of journalist's privilege that allows reporters to protect their sources and confidential information from being disclosed in court. It is a legal right that grants journalists the freedom to do their job without fear of legal consequences.

Example: A journalist receives information from a confidential source about a government scandal. The journalist publishes an article about the scandal, but the government wants to know the identity of the source. The journalist can claim editorial privilege to protect the source's identity and keep the information confidential.

Explanation: This example illustrates how editorial privilege allows journalists to protect their sources and confidential information. Without this privilege, journalists may not be able to report on important issues and hold those in power accountable. Editorial privilege is an important aspect of press freedom and the ability of journalists to do their job without fear of legal repercussions.

edile | editus

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 7 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
17:04
we have been duped.
17:05
Oh well there is always the next election.* *- unless there are no more elections.
texaslawhopefully
17:05
I lean conservative and for a long time was one of those people who thought that he was bad but wasn't a facist and that sort of rhetoric was over-reactive. And for those reasons I voted for Harris, but I think I was underestimating him by far.
gov hiring freeze is insane
Remember when Elon musk literally did the nazi salute twice , yeah
Insane
his goal is to crush public opinion of the government by intentionally making ineffective and then pointing to how ineffective it is
Dkk
17:05
I personally think most people are one issue voters and rhey disagree on principle but things have to be done this say now or else they never will.
17:05
oh well should be a good little 'societal experiment' if u will
@SplitterusClitterus: he clearly just meant his heart goes out to him, just ignore his support for the literal fascist party in germany
17:06
dkk what's your one issue
texaslawhopefully
17:06
I was a one issue voter. My one fucking issue was that Trump encouraged an insurrection.
texaslawhopefully
17:07
That's all anyone should've needed.
17:07
i am a 1 issue voter: national debt.
jackfrost11770
17:07
THERES A COP FUNERAL AND NOW THE BUSES ARENT RUNNING TO MY PLACE SO I HAVE TO WALK IN THE FREEZING COLD HOME
texaslawhopefully
17:07
Not to mention that he's completely thrown away liberalism and classic western political philosophy, but yk your eggs will be cheaper so it's worth it
how bad are these tariffs gonna get for us everyday consumers?
@jackfrost11770: FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUu
jackfrost11770
17:08
FUCK THE NYPD
WASP HAHAHAHAHHA
texaslawhopefully
17:08
Estimates are about 4k fruitbat
YRDSL
17:08
im a 1 issue voter - if i want someone to be elected i vote for them
woof
texaslawhopefully
17:08
I've seen some that could be as high as 7k though
17:08
@jackfrost11770: ya prolly don't buy any lotto tickets tonite
get on that trump coin before the rug pull lol
Dkk
17:09
@BigStrongBug: I don't consider myself a one issue voter but if I had to pick one it would be gender relations.
i am a one issue voter for the economy, which is why i voted harris
texaslawhopefully
17:10
Here's a fairly well respected estimate fruitybat: The proposed tariffs could cost consumers an additional $2,500 to $7,600 a year per household, according to estimates, said Jonathan Gold, vice president of supply chain and customs policy for the National Retail Federation.
i am a voter so i voted
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.