Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

efficient breach theory

Read a random definition: concursus debiti et crediti

A quick definition of efficient breach theory:

Efficient breach theory is the idea that it can sometimes be better for someone to break a contract and pay for the damages than to keep the contract. This is because it might be more efficient and cost less money. When someone breaks a contract, they should only have to pay for the damages they caused, not extra punishment. This is different from the idea that contracts should always be followed no matter what, which is called sanctity of contract.

A more thorough explanation:

Efficient breach theory is a concept that suggests that it is more economically efficient for parties to breach a contract and pay damages than to perform under the contract. This theory encourages courts to award compensatory damages for breaches of contract rather than punitive damages meant to punish the defendant for moral misconduct.

For example, imagine that a company has a contract to deliver goods to another company. However, due to unforeseen circumstances, the cost of delivering the goods has increased significantly. The company may decide that it is more economically efficient to breach the contract and pay damages rather than to perform under the contract and incur significant losses.

Efficient breach theory is in contrast with the sanctity of contract, which suggests that contracts should be upheld regardless of the economic consequences. However, the widespread adoption of efficient breach theory means that punitive damages are rarely available in breach of contract lawsuits.

efficient breach | effluxion of time

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.